|
Men risk anticlimax with anatomy-boosting pants
LONDON (Reuters) – Hundreds of British men are risking a Valentine's Day anticlimax for their partners by stocking up on anatomy-boosting underpants ahead of the most romantic weekend of the year. British department store group Debenhams said Thursday it had seen a 76 percent surge in online sales of the 18 pounds-a-pair ($28) underwear in the past week. The pants work by using a lift and hold feature at the front, like a male version of the cleavage-boosting Wonderbra. "The briefs mean that no man ever needs to feel inadequate again on the most passionate day of the social calendar," said Rob Faucherand, head of men's accessories buying at Debenhams. "However we can't be held responsible for what happens once the pants come off," he added. (Reporting by Mark Potter) |
lol
|
Oh...my...gosh! Is this for real? LOL People will pay for anything!
|
False advertising! I'd be very disappointed that he wasn't "just happy to see me".
|
Originally Posted by Moonpi
False advertising! I'd be very disappointed that he wasn't "just happy to see me".
|
Scam?
|
So funny. Thanks for the laugh. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
|
i don't think so. i read it on the computer in the news section. it was probably in one of those british tabloids, though. ask her majesty if it's true. :lol: :lol:
|
Originally Posted by beachlady
Scam?
|
lordy, you do find the funniest stories!
|
Originally Posted by Moonpi
False advertising! I'd be very disappointed that he wasn't "just happy to see me".
|
Actually, I have to think that this is only fair for men to have a 'support' garment. I mean, after all, we women have bras that do wonders for some of us - in my case - defying the laws of gravity. I wonder how many men have been disappointed when the bra came off and the truth came out? ( I'm referring to women in general.) And just picture every woman in your town out in public without a foundation garment. What's good for the goose is good for the gander? (I've always wanted to use that phrase but never had a real good opportunity.) Or is it good for the gander is good for the goose?
|
Originally Posted by renee765
Actually, I have to think that this is only fair for men to have a 'support' garment. I mean, after all, we women have bras that do wonders for some of us - in my case - defying the laws of gravity. I wonder how many men have been disappointed when the bra came off and the truth came out? And just picture every woman in your town out in public without a foundation garment. What's good for the goose is good for the gander? (I've always wanted to use that phrase but never had a real good opportunity.) Or is it good for the gander is good for the goose?
|
Originally Posted by butterflywing
Originally Posted by renee765
Actually, I have to think that this is only fair for men to have a 'support' garment. I mean, after all, we women have bras that do wonders for some of us - in my case - defying the laws of gravity. I wonder how many men have been disappointed when the bra came off and the truth came out? And just picture every woman in your town out in public without a foundation garment. What's good for the goose is good for the gander? (I've always wanted to use that phrase but never had a real good opportunity.) Or is it good for the gander is good for the goose?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:36 PM. |