Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums > Main
Singer 301?? >

Singer 301??

Singer 301??

Old 03-21-2014, 06:26 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Oregon
Posts: 17
Default Singer 301??

I recently bought a 221 Featherweight and LOVE it..but the throat (?) area is to small as my quilt top grows..wondering if the Singer 301 might be a good step up for quilting my lap size quilts and bigger, tops..won't "quilt" on it..just sew the pieces and rows to complete the tops..
another Singer I was considering is the 201 but awful heavy for retreats and going to quilt groups.???
Do you or a friend own one? thoughts on how it performs? Problems?
What is a fair price for one in really good condition?
thanx for any input..

Carla/OR
QuiltDreamin is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 06:35 PM
  #2  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 213
Default

Ihave one and I like to use it for piecing. It is a super machine, it does not walk all over he table it is a very stable sewing machine. I paid $125.00 for it. I hope you enjoy this machine. I also have featherweight machines, it is fun to use them And they are super for taking to retreats and classes.
ohstr is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 06:38 PM
  #3  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Central NJ
Posts: 5,570
Default

Don't have one yet myself - read YET. While I believe it has a larger throat/harp, I don't know that you will gain that much with a 301 vs FW. Those that own both will jump in soon, I'm sure. I don't know that I'd have a problem stitching my tops, regardless of size, on my FW. Then again, I've only done baby/lap quilt tops on my FW.n But I WANT a 301 anyhow!
NJ Quilter is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 06:54 PM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Oregon
Posts: 17
Default

OHSTR Do you find there is much difference in the throat area between the two..??
I have read the 301 is a FULL SIZE machine? Don't need alot more space than the 221,but a bit would help?
Also love the idea of a handle on it..
QuiltDreamin is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 07:22 PM
  #5  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Hudson Valley,NY
Posts: 238
Default

I am a big fan of the 301s, I own quite a few. The throat space is 7 1/2inches which is really not too shabby. The 301 has a knob that lowers your feed dogs so you may free motion quilt. I am not an expert at FMQ but I find that I do not have as much "eye lashing" and issues with the vertical bobbin which the 301 has. These are very sturdy machines with the same beautiful stitches that the 221 has. The 301 has gears instead of the belt and the motor is much stronger. I love that it is almost impossible to throw off the timing. You do not need to get service, just oil and grease. They are not at all fussy about thread and you don't need to worry about surge protection-no motherboard. The only drawback is that awful button controller-same as the featherweight. I find it terrible uncomfortable at retreat or extended sewing. Two of mine have updated foot controllers, just remove cord from button controller and wire it to just about any controller that you find/ want.i would rather sew on my 301 than my Janome 6600. I think the tension and stitching is exceptional. Everything is so solid, no plastic.It seems that I can maintaina really consistent seam allowance. I believe that is also why everyone loves their featherweights. If you decide to purchase one,here's a few pointers.
I have purchased 301s in Singer desks for as little as$50- prices vary a lot ! The originals in cases are more expensive.Watch craigslist to avoid shipping. Make sure bobbin case is in machine-these are the same ones used by the featherweight and the originals are the best but Expensive- more than buying the machine sometimes. The presser feet are slant shank. Featherweight feet will not fit.
sewnsewsue is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 07:38 PM
  #6  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Oregon
Posts: 17
Default

SewNSewSue, thank you so much for all the great info..I did bid on the one on ebay..it is kinda expensive BUT I am particular about the LOOK of the machine,so will pay for it..my machines are most likely ones I will keep the rest of my life and I take good care of them.
Not sure what you mean by "button controlle",do you mean the foot control button..? I really prefer the one on my Featherweight to my Brother Quattro..easier on my bursitis in my hip..
again, many thanx for your post full of great info..think I will like the slant needle..
QuiltDreamin is offline  
Old 03-21-2014, 08:18 PM
  #7  
Super Member
 
Bluelady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 2,041
Default

I have gotten several 301s on Ebay, never paid over $75 for them. They needed a little cleaning, some new feet on the bottom and Boom! Wonderful machines@
Bluelady is offline  
Old 03-22-2014, 03:17 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Southern Minnesota
Posts: 4,362
Default

I believe they are considered a 3/4 size rather than "full size" machine. I'll let the more seasoned vintage people correct me, if I'm wrong. I have both the FW & 301a machines and absolutely LOVE the 301A. It's the "big sister" to the FW and usually can be had for a lot less $ than the FW. Mine (I have 2) are dependable, workhorse machines. Great for dropping the feedogs and fmq. Easy to maintain. I've quilted queen size quilts on mine. Good luck in you bidding!
liking quilting is offline  
Old 03-22-2014, 04:12 AM
  #9  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: West Texas
Posts: 2,073
Default

I much prefer my 301 over my FW. One of the main reasons is the slant needle, which makes the stitching action so visible. I recently sewed on a nice new modern machine and noticed that it and others have the needle tucked back so far that I almost have to stand on my head to see it.

I love my 301. The feed dogs are narrow, and I understand that there is no walking foot specifically made for them, but I have a slant needle walking foot that operates perfectly on it.

Prices vary. I got lucky and found mine for $20 at a garage sale. Her name is Sissy (big sister to FW). My second one was purchased at the estate sale of a sewing machine repair man. It was $25 or $30. It worked fine, but had been stored in a shed and was extremely dirty. I cleaned it up and eventually gave it to the neighbor girls who sew with me. That one is named Missy.

As far as weight goes, the 301 is a few pounds heavier than a FW, but still light enough to be ideal for carrying to classes.
Daylesewblessed is offline  
Old 03-22-2014, 08:01 AM
  #10  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Duluth/ Superior, WI
Posts: 1,038
Default

I have 2-FW's and 2-301's, and yes the 301 has a wider quilting space. They both use the same bobbins but the feet are not interchangeable. Have not done any FM quilting with either machines as I have a LA and only do straight line quilting with my vintage machines (placemats & small projects, etc.). FW are a lot more exensive than 301. Paid $35.00 for one and $50.00 for the other 301.
QuiltNama is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
montanajan
Main
11
03-04-2021 03:17 PM
miriam
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
154
03-12-2014 07:43 AM
lakekids
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
7
09-16-2012 12:39 PM
Mariposa
Main
8
06-15-2011 07:07 PM
Baby Catcher
Main
3
02-25-2010 12:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


FREE Quilting Newsletter