Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums > Main
Fat Quarters getting smaller ????? >

Fat Quarters getting smaller ?????

Fat Quarters getting smaller ?????

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-09-2012, 02:20 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
borntoquilt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 955
Default Fat Quarters getting smaller ?????

I have been on several web sites today looking for fat quarter sales. When did fat quarters shrink down to 18 x 21 ???? They are still the same price as the 18 x 22's. (I have also noticed this in LQS's!) Is this just another PLOY from the manufacturers to make more $$$ ??? I admit an inch here, inch there may seem like nit picking but all those inches add up to them. Considering they could be selling millions of yards of fabric. Just wondering if I was the only one noticing.... I do not like paying for things I am not getting.... If they want to short us an inch, lower the price !!! I always try to have the store clerk cut my quarters for me even if they have them coming in pre-measured. Thanks for listening!!!
borntoquilt is offline  
Old 07-09-2012, 02:22 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Liz92B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 311
Default

It goes with the full yardage fabric - it's been only 42" wide for quite some time, therefore FQs are only 21" ...
Liz92B is offline  
Old 07-09-2012, 02:31 PM
  #3  
Super Member
 
bluteddi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: MN
Posts: 2,411
Default

I've begun to see much more fabric only 36 "........ so their FQ could really be small
bluteddi is offline  
Old 07-09-2012, 02:33 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
Helen S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Vancouver, Washington State
Posts: 2,113
Default

I too have noticed lately that most of the yardage is only 42" wide, hence the 21" width of the fat quarter, as Liz92B pointed out. So, in essence, yes, you're getting less for your money, as in everything else on the market these days. By reducing the container size, (ie the fabric width) manufacturers can justify keeping prices lower, or so they say. I think prices are still going up no matter what size the product is. I agree...nobody likes paying for things we're not getting, but is there an alternative? Probably not.

Last edited by QuiltnNan; 07-09-2012 at 02:36 PM. Reason: remove political statmen
Helen S is offline  
Old 07-09-2012, 02:39 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 816
Default

18" is the one that has to stay standard. The other is dependent on the width of the fabric.
Skittl1321 is offline  
Old 07-09-2012, 02:48 PM
  #6  
Power Poster
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 17,700
Default

Originally Posted by bluteddi View Post
I've begun to see much more fabric only 36 "........ so their FQ could really be small

IF 36", they'll still be able to give you a FQ ... 1/2 of 36 is 18 .... so then they'll just cut it at 21/22" lengths.




A FQ is 1/2 the width, so they can hardly stretch the fabric if it's only 42"!!
QuiltE is offline  
Old 07-09-2012, 02:52 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Richmond, KY
Posts: 742
Default

A fat quarter of a yard is a fat quarter, period. If the fabric is only 36 inches wide, then a quarter of a yard will be 9 inches long by 36 inches wide. It stands to reason then, that a fat quarter is only going to be 18 inches wide by 18 inches long. There is no written rule that a fat quarter has to be 18 by 21 or 22. It is that because the width of the fabric is 42 or 44 inches.
Ginaky is offline  
Old 07-09-2012, 03:03 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
borntoquilt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 955
Default

Thanks everybody for clearing that up for me! I guess I am stuck back in the OLD days when fabric was still 45"s wide. LOL !! I still haven't gotten use to sewing 3 or 4 WOF strips together and they don't all end @ the same place. That always surprises me.... lol !!!
borntoquilt is offline  
Old 07-10-2012, 10:33 AM
  #9  
Power Poster
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: MN
Posts: 24,391
Default

Back in OLDER days - fabric was 36 inches wide or less. I have a length of 18 inch wide (selvages intact on both sides) calico from?

42 inch wide fabric has been around for at least 20 years (Hoffman and Kaufman are two names that I know of FOR SURE that have had the narrower widths for quite some time.

Interestingly enough, it seems like the 'pricier' lines were narrower before VIP, Peter Pan, Springs, and Marcus Brothers became narrower.

Look at the end of the bolt for the width - or better yet, bring your own tape measure to verify.

Also, some of us factor in shrinkage when we buy fabric. Fabric can shrink lengyhwise, crosswise, and/or both ways - and in a few cases, not at all. And I have run into a couple of weird things that s t r e t c h e d.

So - yelping about fabric becoming narrower - some of it may have - but some of it has 'always' been narrower - seems about as useful as baying at the moon.

I had 'assumed' that two widths of fabrics from the same collection would be measure the same width - so I trimmed off the same amount off the border print that I had trimmed off the main part of a pillowcase I was making - OOPS!

Moral of the story - don't assume!

Last edited by bearisgray; 07-10-2012 at 10:36 AM.
bearisgray is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
craftybear
Links and Resources
5
09-16-2011 11:03 AM
craftybear
Links and Resources
8
08-25-2011 09:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



FREE Quilting Newsletter