Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums > Main
Question for Owners of 9" Throat Sewing Machines >

Question for Owners of 9" Throat Sewing Machines

Question for Owners of 9" Throat Sewing Machines

Old 08-22-2011, 05:02 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 865
Default

And the question is....frame or no frame?

I think 9" of space would be heaven after the 6" space I have, frame or no frame. But it seems like that's not a lot of space to make a frame really worthwhile. However, I know nothing! That's why I'd like your opinions. Is having the 9" on a frame a transformational event? You can see I all about transformation! Thanks in advance for your info!
wishfulthinking is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 05:13 AM
  #2  
Super Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Orbiting
Posts: 1,448
Default

I have the Juki on a table - no frame. I love it! I've heard that people who want it on a frame wind up buying two of them so they can have one for piecing. They are also great for tough sewing. I like making tote bags on it because it easily sews through thick layers. Mine is purely mechanical - extras are just the thread cutter and needle threader (which is a bear to use!).

But, not only is the throat wider, it's higher too. And the lever for the pressor foot is out of the way and does not catch on the quilt. I easily quilted a queen size quilt on it.

That's the pro's, the con is that its a very heavy machine and it needs to be oiled on a regular basis.

I have heard others say that if you want one on a frame, that you should buy the largest one you can afford and don't plan on taking it off the frame for table top sewing. I have heard others saying something about having to take time to adjust the tension whenever you do that. Does not sound worth it to me.
AlienQuilter is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 05:18 AM
  #3  
Member
 
Nn859's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Midway, TN
Posts: 4
Default

I have been using my Juki on an original HandiQuilter frame for years and have had great luck with it. I can quilt up to a queen sized on it if I use warm and natural batting since it is thin and rolls up tightly instead of taking up the the throat space. I can do a twin with poly bat just fine.
Nn859 is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 05:20 AM
  #4  
Super Member
 
LindaR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,916
Default

my juki is on a frame and never comes off except for deep cleaning. you really only get about 5/6" of actual space to quilt. Pennyvalley makes a machine with a 13" throat that would fit on my frame but the quarentee is only 6 mo???? seems weird but may be worth it to have more space.
LindaR is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 05:26 AM
  #5  
Super Member
 
weezie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Douglas County, GA
Posts: 1,722
Default

One definite benefit to using a frame is not having to baste quilt layers together and, therefore, no basting to remove while it's being quilted. I had to dismantle my frame when my son lost his job and came back here to live, so I've set my 9" machine up on a table; the machine is surrounded by styrofoam which is covered with heavy vinyl + I've a slider in the needle/throatplate area. The table is butted on the back & both sides by walls/shelf unit, so the quilt stays on the table. I haven't used it enough to give it a rating; it seems to work o.k., but, as I said, I am back to having to sandwich & baste. On the plus side, I'm no longer confined to the narrow quilting space that the 9" on a frame provides.
weezie is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 05:42 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
LindaR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,916
Default

Originally Posted by LindaR
my juki is on a frame and never comes off except for deep cleaning. you really only get about 5/6" of actual space to quilt. Pennyvalley makes a machine with a 13" throat that would fit on my frame but the quarentee is only 6 mo???? seems weird but may be worth it to have more space.
its actually pennywinklefarms.com....can be used on a table also....check it out
LindaR is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 05:57 AM
  #7  
Super Member
 
RenaB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Georgia
Posts: 1,130
Default

I have a juki on a grace pinnacle frame and it does well. I have a separate machine for piecing because getting the juki on/off the frame is not hard but I do not want to do it all the time because it does take some time t get it lined up right.
RenaB is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 05:59 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
azwendyg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Flagstaff, AZ
Posts: 2,078
Default

Originally Posted by AlienQuilter
I have the Juki on a table - no frame. I love it! I've heard that people who want it on a frame wind up buying two of them so they can have one for piecing. They are also great for tough sewing. I like making tote bags on it because it easily sews through thick layers. Mine is purely mechanical - extras are just the thread cutter and needle threader (which is a bear to use!).

But, not only is the throat wider, it's higher too. And the lever for the pressor foot is out of the way and does not catch on the quilt. I easily quilted a queen size quilt on it.

That's the pro's, the con is that its a very heavy machine and it needs to be oiled on a regular basis.

I have heard others say that if you want one on a frame, that you should buy the largest one you can afford and don't plan on taking it off the frame for table top sewing. I have heard others saying something about having to take time to adjust the tension whenever you do that. Does not sound worth it to me.
Ditto! Same thoughts, exactly, on my Juki TL98Q.
azwendyg is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 06:08 AM
  #9  
Super Member
 
Charlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6,442
Default

I have a Pfaff 1200 on a frame. It's nicer for me than having to pin or baste and then wrestle the fabric around, but if I could afford it, I'd go for a larger throat/harp.

By the time you get to the end of a queen size quilt, you're working with just a few inches, because the roll takes up space in the throat. Great for meandering or stippling, not so much for designs other than narrow pantos. All the starting and stopping to complete a design make for a LOT of sitting and burying threads unless you do them as you go, which makes for a LOT of standing and burying threads. ;)
Charlee is offline  
Old 08-22-2011, 06:24 AM
  #10  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 1,991
Default

There is a mid-arm set up at our LQS that we do our Community quilts on. It works and does get the job done but it would be nice not to have to stop and roll after one pass down and one back. It's a Husqvarna machine and usually takes about 6 bobbins to finish a twin size quilt using an overall stipple or meander. More space and a larger bobbin would work much better for us.
Shelbie is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dina
Main
15
01-19-2014 06:15 AM
quilt1950
General Chit-Chat (non-quilting talk)
18
08-10-2013 07:41 PM
Janis
Main
5
08-14-2011 04:55 AM
jcarilyn
Main
17
06-25-2010 07:37 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


FREE Quilting Newsletter