Welcome to the Quilting Board!

Already a member? Login above
loginabove
OR
To post questions, help other quilters and reduce advertising (like the one on your left), join our quilting community. It's free!

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: The differences between the W&W D9 and Singer 9W

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Bikini Bottom
    Posts
    5,746
    Okay there has been a lot of talk about these machines and I thought I would shed some light on the matter since I own one of each now. I will include photos of them so you can compare the two together and then you will see the differences.

    Singer bought out the Wheeler and Wilson factory in 1905 and after they took over they grabbed the left over parts from the D9 and decaled them out and sold them as Singers. Then after they cleaned out the surplus they started casting their own versions of the machine and selling them for a short time after that.

    We have already established that the machines that were made from the left over parts from the W&W's had a "W" in front of the serial number and the later Singer cast ones had the plain old numbers but still used the Wheeler and Wilson serials to keep up with the production. But there are several differences between the two machines that you can not tell unless you have them sitting side by side.

    The biggest difference between the two you can see is the fact that the Singer machine has a longer and wider base to it. The engineers were trying to keep everything uniform and semi interchangeable by adding to the bed so that the machine would fit into their cabinets with out having to retool for the machine. The spool pin was in an entirely different place and was just a pin and not the fold over spool holder that W&W was famous for. In fact the casting is completely different because of the bed extension and the serial boss in the rear of the machine. Even the hinge pin locations are in different spots and the Singer machines had grub screws to hold them on the pins where the W&W relied upon a drip pan that was hinged into the cabinet to hold the machine in place.

    The things that are almost verbatim are the bobbin assemblies on the early Singer castings. They have the same exact parts and part numbers. The face plates are identical including part numbers on the upper tension and the mechanics behind the faceplate are the same.

    Billy

    W&W D9 on the left, 9W on the right
    Name:  Attachment-92809.jpe
Views: 487
Size:  53.2 KB

    Spool pin for the W&W
    Name:  Attachment-92810.jpe
Views: 506
Size:  48.4 KB

    Spool pin for the Singer cast machine
    Name:  Attachment-92811.jpe
Views: 526
Size:  55.0 KB

    Bobbin assembly for the Singer cast machine (early version)
    Name:  Attachment-92813.jpe
Views: 517
Size:  63.3 KB

    Veiws from the front W&W still on the left. The Singer is wider than the W&W
    Name:  Attachment-93387.jpe
Views: 496
Size:  63.1 KB

    W&W Bobbin assembly
    Name:  Attachment-93696.jpe
Views: 493
Size:  58.1 KB

    Bobbin winder for the Singer cast machine
    Name:  Attachment-93699.jpe
Views: 500
Size:  65.9 KB

    Difference in the length
    Name:  Attachment-93772.jpe
Views: 483
Size:  73.5 KB

    Underside of the machines. Notice the difference in the hinge pin locations W&W is on the left.
    Name:  Attachment-93933.jpe
Views: 471
Size:  61.0 KB

    Bobbin winder for the W&W
    Name:  Attachment-93934.jpe
Views: 479
Size:  60.9 KB

    Veiws from the rear W&W still on the left
    Name:  Attachment-94023.jpe
Views: 468
Size:  61.8 KB

  2. #2
    Super Member wolph33's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Wi
    Posts
    9,093
    I have an old Wheeler and Wilson treadle.worked when I got it,just decoration now.I am sure it would work still-I just don't use it.

  3. #3
    Power Poster amma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Out searching for some sunshine :-)
    Posts
    59,114
    Blog Entries
    1
    Thank you for the explanations :D:D:D

  4. #4
    Power Poster sueisallaboutquilts's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    17,478
    Thanks Billy, you are a wealth of knowledge in the sewing machine department.

  5. #5
    Super Member KatFish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Indiana
    Posts
    2,066
    Blog Entries
    8
    Thanks Billy for the Pictures and history lesson.

  6. #6
    Super Member vintagemotif's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Posts
    4,968
    Blog Entries
    10
    Thank you for the compilation on the 9W.
    The decals on the Singer are beautiful!

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Bikini Bottom
    Posts
    5,746
    Quote Originally Posted by vintagemotif
    Thank you for the compilation on the 9W.
    The decals on the Singer are beautiful!
    I still have to clean that machine up when I get around to it. All I did was unpack it and wiped the dust off of it and got it to where it will run smooth as silk.

    Billy

  8. #8

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Middleport, NY (near Buffalo)
    Posts
    91
    That explanation helped a lot, one more question though?

    Is the bobbin the only difference between the singer 9w and the 9w7?

    I was looking for the manual and found this site : http://www.tias.com/stores/relics/

    after looking at the bobbins I think the one you have pictured and mine are both 9w7 according to the website. Did I get that right?

    Cheryl

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Bikini Bottom
    Posts
    5,746
    I am going out to the studio in a minute and I am going to see if the 301 bobbin will work in mine.

    Billy

  10. #10

    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Middleport, NY (near Buffalo)
    Posts
    91
    Did the 301 bobbin fit?

Page 1 of 2 1 2 LastLast

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.