Montgomery Ward UHT J1261

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-30-2014, 03:39 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: State of NY
Posts: 29
Default Montgomery Ward UHT J1261

My "herd" consists mostly of Kenmores and some Singers. I had the good fortune to find this "Montgomery Ward" model UHT J1261 machine for $2. Really dirty and has a little corrosion on foot pedal and on the bottom of the only presser foot. No big deal and sews like a dream. I would like to find more presser feet. So far none of my other feet are a match. Can anyone lead me in a direction? I see MW machines on ebay but no attachments. I realize there was no MW sewing machine company of course.
I took a photo of the presser foot but the file is too big to upload here and I can't figure that out. Anyway, it's a slanted. high foot, not low shank.
Thanks so much!
Kathie
Vintagesewist is offline  
Old 10-31-2014, 04:23 AM
  #2  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Centralia, WA, USA
Posts: 4,890
Default

IIRC pictures need to be 640x480 pixels or smaller to load them on the site. If you don't have a program that will resize your pictures you can either download a free program like PIXprsizer or use a photo hosting site like photobucket to do it.
I know I'm interested in which feet it uses too. I thought only Singer used a slant shank though it's very possible I'm wrong on that.
The only MW machine we have here uses low shank feet.
Sew-Classic.com has a guide to different feet here: http://shop.sew-classic.com/What-sha...hank-Style.htm
That might help you find the right feet too.
Rodney

Last edited by Rodney; 10-31-2014 at 04:26 AM.
Rodney is offline  
Old 10-31-2014, 07:13 AM
  #3  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: State of NY
Posts: 29
Default

Thanks Rodney,
I have that chart for feet. It does say "Singer" slant which I never thought might mean there are others.
My camera let me re size.
Left to right - Kenmore 1802, MW, Singer 404.
Interesting, right?
Attached Thumbnails hpim2196.jpg  
Vintagesewist is offline  
Old 10-31-2014, 07:47 AM
  #4  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: State of NY
Posts: 29
Default

Boy, am I sorry I bothered everyone with this. The Singer foot DOES fit except that it has a small "foot print", no pun. The Singer foot doesn't allow for the full width ZZ. and it doesn't quite cover the feed dogs. And the MW is left homing.
Will report back. Thanks Rodney.
Vintagesewist is offline  
Old 10-31-2014, 10:37 AM
  #5  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8,091
Default

Kenmore = Ultra High Shank
MW = High Shank
Singer 404 = Slant shank.

You might get away with using the Singer foot on the MW, but if you use the MW foot on the Singer you are risking knocking the presser foot shaft out of adjustment. Those two feet are similar, but not interchangeable.

Joe
J Miller is offline  
Old 10-31-2014, 10:38 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8,091
Default

Oh yeah, those 70s and up Singer feet are terrible. When my we use those vintage machines we toss the factory foot in a box and put on a much better aftermarket foot. It makes a tremendous improvement in sewing for those machines.

Joe
J Miller is offline  
Old 10-31-2014, 04:23 PM
  #7  
Super Member
 
mlmack's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 1,382
Default

Do you have a picture of the front of the machine?
mlmack is offline  
Old 10-31-2014, 05:19 PM
  #8  
Senior Member
 
KenmoreRulesAll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Puget Sound Region
Posts: 772
Default

Has anyone here sewn on a Monty URR 292 Signature? They look great but they only appear on CL very rarely. My favorite of that brand based on looks. I like the 21 and 7 Jewel machines, too.
KenmoreRulesAll is offline  
Old 11-01-2014, 04:53 AM
  #9  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: State of NY
Posts: 29
Default

lol I like this one 'cause it was $2. It has the textured mocha finish. Thanks guys for all the info.

I'm sorry the photos come up double. Here's the front.
Attached Thumbnails hpim2197.jpg   hpim2198.jpg   hpim2199.jpg  
Vintagesewist is offline  
Old 11-01-2014, 06:49 AM
  #10  
Senior Member
 
KenmoreRulesAll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Puget Sound Region
Posts: 772
Default

"lol I like this one 'cause it was $2."

Score! Nice machine, too. I've always liked glossy splatter finishes like that one.
KenmoreRulesAll is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
judy_68
Main
21
02-11-2021 09:00 PM
roguequilter
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
15
05-03-2018 05:25 PM
redpurselady
Pictures
23
02-19-2017 01:36 AM
Blackberry
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
25
12-23-2016 02:25 AM
Central Ohio Quilter
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
6
02-28-2014 08:10 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



FREE Quilting Newsletter