Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums > Main > For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
Singer 15-91 used for longarm? >

Singer 15-91 used for longarm?

Singer 15-91 used for longarm?

Thread Tools
 
Old 02-14-2012, 03:47 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: suburb of Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 651
Default Singer 15-91 used for longarm?

Did someone post something about using a Singer 15-91 for long arm quilting?

Either I can't find the post via 'search' or I am having a 'senior moment' (happens a lot lately ) and I am just imagining that I read something about the 15-91 used for long arm quilting.

Shari
Mom3 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 05:15 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 9,319
Default

Maybe it was stretched? Because it sure isn't a long arm. It would still have an intsy bobbin though and that would drive me insane.
Candace is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 06:13 PM
  #3  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: suburb of Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 651
Default

I don't recall the conversation stating it was stretched. Maybe I should have used the term "mid arm" instead.

Shari
Mom3 is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 09:10 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
Charlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6,442
Default

Mom3, I believe a "mid-arm" starts at 9 inch harp space, and the 15-91 is just short of that. The 201 would qualify. I don't see the small bobbins as being a problem as many like to use the 15-91 for FMQ, and they work fine for that...Just have to be willing to change them more often.
Charlee is offline  
Old 02-14-2012, 10:07 PM
  #5  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8,091
Default

Mom3,

Here is the site with the stretched machines. It might be what you were thinking of.
http://www.thequiltingsolution.com/

Joe
J Miller is offline  
Old 02-15-2012, 05:13 AM
  #6  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Mom3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: suburb of Milwaukee, WI
Posts: 651
Default

Well, I found a photo of one but that's about it: http://good-times.webshots.com/photo...02197914rwExbl
Mom3 is offline  
Old 02-15-2012, 07:35 AM
  #7  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 9,319
Default

Originally Posted by Charlee View Post
Mom3, I believe a "mid-arm" starts at 9 inch harp space, and the 15-91 is just short of that. The 201 would qualify. I don't see the small bobbins as being a problem as many like to use the 15-91 for FMQ, and they work fine for that...Just have to be willing to change them more often.
The small bobbin is a problem if you're contemplating putting it on a frame.
Candace is offline  
Old 02-15-2012, 07:44 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
Charlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6,442
Default

Originally Posted by Candace View Post
The small bobbin is a problem if you're contemplating putting it on a frame.
Candace, I don't understand how it's any more of a problem on a frame than it is on a tabletop or in a cabinet. Depending on the density of the quilting, you'd likely get one row at least per bobbin, and maybe two. What would be more of a problem in my eyes is the fact that you're just not going to get a big quilt done with that setup.
Charlee is offline  
Old 02-15-2012, 07:53 AM
  #9  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 9,319
Default

Charlee, long arms are made with large bobbins for a reason. Removing the machine from the frame and or the slide plate on that particular machine would be a huge hassle every time the bobbin emptied(very often). And burying the knots from so many starts and stops another hassle. The short arm of the machine and the miniature area to quilt would be a huge negative too. It's more of a headache changing a bobbin on a frame vs. a cabinet or table top.
Candace is offline  
Old 02-15-2012, 08:02 AM
  #10  
Super Member
 
Charlee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Idaho
Posts: 6,442
Default

Ok....you got me with the burying threads part!! I HATE that! I still can't see that changing out the bobbin while on a frame would be any different than any other machine on a frame, other than the frequency. I had that Pfaff on a frame...just ran it down to one end of the frame off the quilt and changed the bobbins...
Truth be told, unless it's a longarm that gives you a lot of space, I don't think frames for machines are worth the space or hassle...but that's strictly a personal opinion/preference!
Charlee is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Still Sew N
Main
16
10-13-2018 07:37 AM
miriam
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
154
03-12-2014 07:43 AM
beateannkeith
Main
2
02-06-2011 07:44 PM
MikkiG
Main
7
10-12-2009 05:23 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



FREE Quilting Newsletter