0% versus skim milk
#5
Power Poster
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 17,700
Ditto to the others 0% is skim milk.
However ... perhaps you are asking the difference between skim milk processed the original way and the newer pur-filtered or fine-filtered milks?
Because of the process they go thru, they do tend to seem richer, and are often advertised as seeming to be more like a milk with butterfat (as in 1% or 2%)
Would this be the question you were posing?
However ... perhaps you are asking the difference between skim milk processed the original way and the newer pur-filtered or fine-filtered milks?
Because of the process they go thru, they do tend to seem richer, and are often advertised as seeming to be more like a milk with butterfat (as in 1% or 2%)
Would this be the question you were posing?
#6
I think she just didnt realize O% and skim are the same. Different dairies use different names on the containers. By shopping at various stores, you will see both used. Also, years ago, we used the term skim and now they say no-fat or non-fat.
I used to think skim was watery and almost translucent. But now that is all I purchase and I dont feel that way. I dont know if the processing has changed over the years.
I used to think skim was watery and almost translucent. But now that is all I purchase and I dont feel that way. I dont know if the processing has changed over the years.
#8
I think the industry is using 0% as a marketing ploy. Since everyone is on the low-fat-no-fat craze 0% "sounds" better than "skim" does. Since I have problems with milk, I have not drank a glass of (cow) milk in many years. But I do remember that skim did look and taste watery. I do cook with milk when I make Mac and cheese or when something needs milk, I use 2%. For cereal, I use coconut milk. Funny, I can eat cheese, yogurt and ice cream, but milk kills my stomach.
Last edited by Bneighbor; 07-31-2013 at 05:05 AM. Reason: My own poor proof reading
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post