Englislh can be confusing

Old 09-10-2013, 06:12 AM
  #21  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Lebanon Missouri
Posts: 2,668
Default

Last year my GD brought home her list of spelling words for Fridays test. Then she had to write sentences using each word with both pronunciations. She was 8 at the time.she says -With all the letters in the ABC's the people from the olden days could have been more creative when spelling words... but we challenged her and the word READ stumped her because if you say I red the book then it's now the color. But that still did nothing for convincing her the people from the olden days knew what they were doing
Stitchit123 is offline  
Old 09-10-2013, 06:27 AM
  #22  
Senior Member
 
germanquilter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Maryland
Posts: 314
Default

Originally Posted by Anael View Post
It's even more amazing we are able to learn your language
My thoughts exactly...born and raised in Germany; moved to the United States in 1984
germanquilter is offline  
Old 09-10-2013, 11:42 AM
  #23  
Power Poster
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: East Oklahoma - pining for Massachusetts
Posts: 10,477
Default

Why do flammable and inflammable mean the same thing??
Boston1954 is offline  
Old 09-10-2013, 02:22 PM
  #24  
Super Member
 
noveltyjunkie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: 53 degrees North
Posts: 1,679
Default

Originally Posted by Boston1954 View Post
Why do flammable and inflammable mean the same thing??
That is a head scratcher alright. I have been told that inflammable was the original word (related to inflame) but because 'in' often means 'not' (invisible, inescapable, etc) someone decided not to use 'inflammable' on warning signs and made up 'flammable' instead.

Has anyone else heard that? I don't know if it is true or not.

For me though, one if the craziest things about English is not a spelling thing but a pronunciation thing. Why do 'can' and can't' sound almost exactly the same in the middle of a sentence?

Last edited by noveltyjunkie; 09-10-2013 at 02:25 PM.
noveltyjunkie is offline  
Old 09-10-2013, 04:49 PM
  #25  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 8,687
Default

That was a wonderful read. Thanks for all that information.
Blue Bell is offline  
Old 09-10-2013, 05:34 PM
  #26  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,281
Default

There was a funny incident on Fox News Sunday this week... Chris Wallace was interviewing some government spokes-zombie about the Syria situation, who kept repeating himself with non-answers. Finally, Chris, after having rephrased his question for the third time and getting nowhere, said, "Well, you've got to admit there's a considerable incidence of mendacity here." The guy looked a little confused, but continued repeating himself. I half expected Chris to roll his eyes, but he was ever the gentleman, and didn't. The guy apparently never realized Chris had told him he was lying. <G> I chuckled about that all day. It's amazing how many word twins we have in English, one from Latin/Greek, the other (usually shorter and simpler) from German/Old Norse, and someone who doesn't know that can be easily "worded" to death by someone who does. But that one should go down in newsroom history.
Alondra is offline  
Old 09-10-2013, 05:39 PM
  #27  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,281
Default

Originally Posted by noveltyjunkie View Post
That is a head scratcher alright. I have been told that inflammable was the original word (related to inflame) but because 'in' often means 'not' (invisible, inescapable, etc) someone decided not to use 'inflammable' on warning signs and made up 'flammable' instead.

Has anyone else heard that? I don't know if it is true or not.

For me though, one if the craziest things about English is not a spelling thing but a pronunciation thing. Why do 'can' and can't' sound almost exactly the same in the middle of a sentence?
Sloppy diction. There is no reason they should sound the same, no matter where they fall in the sentence. Although, in something like "The baby can't talk yet." it could be elision with the two t's together, but again... sloppy diction. Sometimes we're forced to depend for meaning on other (limiting) words in the sentence, like "yet" in that sentence.
Alondra is offline  
Old 09-10-2013, 08:31 PM
  #28  
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Lower Mainland B.C.
Posts: 1
Default

If you delete the word "up" in 90% of your examples, the sentence be improved. The sky does not cloud up or down, it just becomes cloudy.
Prairie Chicken is offline  
Old 09-11-2013, 02:20 AM
  #29  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Quebec, Canada
Posts: 1,861
Default

Originally Posted by Prairie Chicken View Post
If you delete the word "up" in 90% of your examples, the sentence be improved. The sky does not cloud up or down, it just becomes cloudy.
I agree.. the "up" "down" "off" "in" "out" etc... give me headackes when I try to use them after a verb loll
helou is offline  
Old 09-11-2013, 06:26 AM
  #30  
Power Poster
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Upland CA
Posts: 18,376
Default

That is great!
mighty is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
tngal22
Main
13
07-15-2012 09:19 AM
Joeysnana
Main
3
01-22-2011 12:44 PM
danmar
Pictures
72
03-29-2010 12:02 PM
merryj
Main
8
02-01-2010 01:12 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


FREE Quilting Newsletter