Quiltingboard Forums

Quiltingboard Forums (https://www.quiltingboard.com/)
-   General Chit-Chat (non-quilting talk) (https://www.quiltingboard.com/general-chit-chat-non-quilting-talk-f7/)
-   -   Old Fashioned Photographs (https://www.quiltingboard.com/general-chit-chat-non-quilting-talk-f7/old-fashioned-photographs-t297267.html)

mac 05-30-2018 11:04 AM

I always thought that it was because life was so hard back then. But then my brother, who is a photographer, explained what everyone else has said. They had to stand so still for such a long period of time that they didn't smile. I am surprised that I have rarely seen an old-time picture where someone was photographed with their eyes closed. Which also explains why they have such strange looking expressions in some of the photographs. Can you imagine not blinking for that whole time. Dry eyes, anyone?

nativetexan 05-30-2018 11:29 AM

having one's photograph was a serious thing, so no moving or smiling was permitted.

glassbird 05-30-2018 01:18 PM

You can blink during a long exposure and not have it show. Those really old pics could take as long as 2 or 3 minutes. So a blink would not be an issue, but any movement of the head or facial muscles would result in a blur.

I have a large collection of family tintypes and daguerreotypes and am extremely fortunate to have names attached to most of them, and some stories as well. One in particular was taken in about 1870, and has my great great grandmother seated, with a child in her lap. Its rare to see daguerreotypes of very young children because you just can't keep a child absolutely still long enough. Well, my great great grandmother was a determined woman, and was proud of her children, and apparently was set on having a picture of that baby. Some baby pictures were achieved by setting the child on a fabric drape and having the parent grip the child firmly thru the drape, so that the steadying hands did not show, but my ancestress opted to simply hold that baby's head in one hand, and his body with the other. Her firm grip is the first thing most people comment on when they see that picture...but it worked. Unfortunately, if we have the dates correct, it is the only picture of that baby as he passed away, as so many children did those days, before he was even old enough to walk.

I think I have that pic saved on a thumb drive...if I can find it I will add it to this thread.

SusieQOH 05-30-2018 01:41 PM

I have some lovely daguerrotypes that I've always displayed. When my boys were little they said it gave them the creeps and couldn't understand why I'd want photos of people I didn't know haha
I got them at antique shops or flea markets.

Boston1954 05-30-2018 03:54 PM

I have a few of our family. Maybe I should bring them out. I love that they are actually printed on tin.

solstice3 05-31-2018 12:38 PM

We had a photographer at a Reenactment do tin types. It is definitely a timely experience. Sit still don’t blink if at all possible. Thank heavens for modern technology

leonf 05-31-2018 07:42 PM

1 Attachment(s)
I have a 1913 camera that could shoot tintypes.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:51 PM.