Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums > Main
80/20 vs 100% cotton batting? >

80/20 vs 100% cotton batting?

80/20 vs 100% cotton batting?

Thread Tools
 
Old 05-21-2010, 09:47 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
MNQuilter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 688
Default

So I was at Walmart this morning and they now have Fairfield 80/20 batting in packages. It was about $16 for a queen size package. I've almost always used Warm and Natural 100% cotton which is $5-6/yd for 45in. Can someone explain to me why one would be better over the other? I don't care for the polyester batting and don't often use it. I think Quilters Dream is 80/20 and have seen people mention really liking it, so I'm just wondering the differences. I like the price of the package better!
MNQuilter is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 09:50 AM
  #2  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 3,382
Default

I used Fairfield 80/20 in the package on one recent quilt. It worked just fine. Just be careful, when sandwiching the quilt. It pulls apart easier than some battings.
mytwopals is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 09:54 AM
  #3  
Power Poster
 
amma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Out searching for some sunshine :-)
Posts: 58,856
Default

One 80/20 I looked at on Monday was very nice batting. The "scrim" I think she said was the 20, it was supposed to help the batting hold togther better. It was so soft and nice. :D:D:D
amma is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 10:01 AM
  #4  
Super Member
 
ghostrider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,688
Default

Originally Posted by amma
One 80/20 I looked at on Monday was very nice batting. The "scrim" I think she said was the 20, it was supposed to help the batting hold togther better. It was so soft and nice. :D:D:D
If that's true, then Warm and Natural would be called the same. It has a poly scrim through which the cotton is needle punched.
ghostrider is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 10:02 AM
  #5  
Super Member
 
Marjpf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Greater Los Angeles Area
Posts: 1,903
Default

I had two packages of the Quilters Dream that I got on sale and had run out of the Warm and Natural. I find it needles really nicely, but is very thin and has a tendency to get thin spots of you need to pull it anywhere.
Marjpf is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 05:38 PM
  #6  
Google Goddess
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Central Indiana (USA)
Posts: 30,181
Default

learning alot, thanks for this thread
craftybear is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 07:28 PM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: central California
Posts: 636
Default

I have never used W&N but I have read and heard from those who have used both that the W&N is very heavy in a large quilt. I have always used 80/20 by Hobbs and I like it a lot.
roselady is offline  
Old 05-21-2010, 09:32 PM
  #8  
Power Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 12,930
Default

]

I haven't used the Fairfield 80/20, but have used Hobbs 80/20 and liked it. I doubt that the 80/20 would be needlepunched through scrim. Warm n Natural is needle-punched through scrim which makes it extremely stable, but also gives it a slightly stiffer drape. Hobbs 80/20 has a very soft drape. Its biggest difference from non-needlepunched 100% cotton batting is that it has more puffiness and is much easier to hand needle. (Both work great for machine quilting.)

Quilter's Dream is needlepunched, but not through a scrim. The needlepunching gives it a lot of stability but does not stiffen the drape. Quilter's Dream will work up thinner than Hobbs 80/20. A lot of hand quilters like Quilter's Dream. Machine quilters may find it on the flat side and want more "puff".

The Hobbs 80/20 is not needlepunched, which means you need to handle it a little more carefully when layering. Quilter's Dream will result in a flatter effect than 80/20 because of the needlepunching. Warm n Natural will be the heaviest and stiffest because of the needlepunching through scrim, but its stability will mean that quilting lines can be much farther apart than 80/20. The scrim also makes hand needling a little more difficult. As someone else mentioned, the scrim also makes WnN heavier in weight than 80/20 batting.
Prism99 is offline  
Old 05-22-2010, 03:27 AM
  #9  
Power Poster
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Northern Michigan
Posts: 12,861
Default

the fairfield 80/20 pulls apart and as far as i'm concern is HORRIBLE to work with at least on a long-arm...maybe for home machine where it is all basted down and for smaller projects it is ok...it is very soft...but when i loaded it on the long arm where it hangs over the edge of table is just pulls apart with it's own weight and when someone brings me a quilt to quilt for them and brings that batting i always ask if they would mind if i used something different...seems they buy it because it's cheap...it is nothing like working with warm & natural, or the dream cotton's/dream poly's...hand quilter's love it though, because it is very soft.
ckcowl is offline  
Old 05-22-2010, 04:16 AM
  #10  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 4,345
Default

I've used the Fairfield 80/20 once to be honest I don't like it. It was difficult to hand quilt and to achieve small stiches, probably because of it's finishing or coating. Also it pulls apart very very quickly. I do perfer the Hobbs brand for 80/20.
Borntohandquilt is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
newbee3
Main
8
12-03-2019 04:19 PM
running1
Main
12
04-10-2015 04:33 PM
stillclock
Main
8
10-25-2012 06:25 PM
huntannette
Main
79
06-10-2011 01:28 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



FREE Quilting Newsletter