Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums >
  • Main
  • For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
  • Best Singer made post WW- II to 1960/65 models >
  • Best Singer made post WW- II to 1960/65 models

  • Best Singer made post WW- II to 1960/65 models

    Thread Tools
     
    Old 09-12-2015, 05:05 AM
      #31  
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2012
    Posts: 673
    Default

    Originally Posted by soman2
    Hello all,

    If you had just one Singer to pick, which one would it be. This question is for anyone that uses and not just collects machines. The machine would be frequently used, and is used for domestic sewing on cotton fabrics light and heavy weight. I am thinking about adding just one more machine to the herd and would like a few user reviews. Thanks for your assistance.

    Soman2

    The other Rodney
    The best post-WWII Singer model is the 401 and (to keep Miriam's blood pressure within range) the 403. The 404 is an excellent straight-stitch-only machine, as is the slightly-prettier 301. Your only other real options for models introduced post WWII are the 500s with their fragile hinges or the 306/319s, with their oddball needles and cumbersome bobbin placement.

    If you wish to include models that were introduced earlier but continued to be made into the 1950s, you might want to check out the snazzy 15-125, really just a 15-91 dressed up for the prom in mint and sage.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]530521[/ATTACH]
    Attached Thumbnails singer-15-125-025.jpg  
    Manalto is offline  
    Old 09-12-2015, 01:45 PM
      #32  
    Super Member
     
    ArchaicArcane's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Jul 2012
    Location: Not Here
    Posts: 3,817
    Default

    Originally Posted by manicmike
    That's right Tammi (I've had two of them). The German ones are almost the same as the US ones (I've had a couple of 401a too) but they feel smoother and 'tighter'.

    And the 431G is a free arm with chain stitch. Now that would be one worth having.
    Thanks for the confirmation.

    I've had 2 431Gs here. I got rid of both of them and kept a 411G. The 431Gs both were persnickety machines. Both came to me with timing problems, one of them I had to time a second time and found set screws on the hook shaft/gear loose that I KNOW I tightened. The other one, I had to repair the hook on - MASSIVE needle strike damage right on the tip. I also had to change the throat plate pins on both of them. I just felt like the 411G was a tighter, better built, nicer running machine.


    I agree that in general the German machines feel smoother and tighter. Quieter too somehow. Interestingly, I've also had abused 431Gs and 411Gs and never had one with stuck stitch selectors. Seriously borked tensioners, yes. Broken spool pins, a given. All of the stitch selector problems have always been on the American ones. I wonder why though? Same environment, maybe the German ones cost more and people took better care of them because of it?
    ArchaicArcane is offline  
    Old 09-12-2015, 03:27 PM
      #33  
    Super Member
     
    Sunflowerzz's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Sep 2013
    Location: Far Northern California
    Posts: 1,020
    Default

    Originally Posted by Sewnoma
    I've never sewn on a 401/403, but I LOVE my Rocketeer (500A). I confess I bought it purely based on the looks, but it's a great machine as well. It's the only machine in my herd that naturally has a perfect scant 1/4" seam allowance with my 1/4" foot - all the rest of them (new and vintage) need tweaking to get that. It runs smooth and the stitches are nice. I haven't used a lot of the decorative stuff but I DID use the blind hem stitch for the first time in my entire life on that machine and it went better than I anticipated.

    I've become very fond of the slant needle, it's SO easy to see what's going on right at the needle. Plus it's easy to supply - takes standard size needle, class 66 bobbins, and the cams are everywhere.

    I like a lot of my machines and deliberately make an effort to rotate through using all of them, but the Rocketeer gets the most use out of the vintage machines I have and I'm always happy to be sewing on it. (Even over my F-word machine, lol Miriam...)
    Yep, I love my rockateer too.
    Sunflowerzz is offline  
    Old 09-13-2015, 09:48 AM
      #34  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2013
    Location: Centralia, WA, USA
    Posts: 4,890
    Default

    Even if I didn't use it much I would love to find a 431G. I voted for the 401A because we have one. None of the slant needle zigzag Singers are overly intuitive to use but they're so capable that they're worth learning to use properly. I do think the 401A is smoother and more powerful than the Touch & Sews I've used. That's why I gave it to Olivia. I want her to have a really nice machine.
    The only other zigzag machine I've used that compares in smoothness is the Brother I have here. It doesn't take cams so is much more limited though.
    Rodney
    Rodney is offline  
    Old 09-13-2015, 12:17 PM
      #35  
    Power Poster
     
    Join Date: Mar 2011
    Location: Somewhere
    Posts: 15,506
    Default

    Originally Posted by Manalto
    The best post-WWII Singer model is the 401 and (to keep Miriam's blood pressure within range) the 403. The 404 is an excellent straight-stitch-only machine, as is the slightly-prettier 301. Your only other real options for models introduced post WWII are the 500s with their fragile hinges or the 306/319s, with their oddball needles and cumbersome bobbin placement.

    If you wish to include models that were introduced earlier but continued to be made into the 1950s, you might want to check out the snazzy 15-125, really just a 15-91 dressed up for the prom in mint and sage.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]530521[/ATTACH]
    I didn't know the 15s did zz.
    The 404s are nice, too. I bought about 20 of them one time.

    I have a gutsy Singer 15-75 that I keep set up - it may not zz but it sews about anything - I also put on a heavy motor.
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]530657[/ATTACH]
    Attached Thumbnails do-rag-009.jpg  
    miriam is offline  
    Old 09-13-2015, 12:35 PM
      #36  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: May 2010
    Location: Round Rock,Texas
    Posts: 6,135
    Default

    403,503,tan 221,237. I use my machines. I'm mostly a quilter, sometimes I make bags and garments too.
    purplefiend is offline  
    Old 09-13-2015, 12:39 PM
      #37  
    Super Member
     
    ArchaicArcane's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Jul 2012
    Location: Not Here
    Posts: 3,817
    Default

    Originally Posted by Rodney
    Even if I didn't use it much I would love to find a 431G.
    I'll let you know if I come across another one then. I will warn you though - because they are truly uncommon, especially on this side of the world- they do tend to go for relatively high dollars. Check completed eBay sales. Serviced and fully working ones fetch good money. Even unserviced ones are higher than the average attic fresh "mid-century" machine. The one I sold was actually sold because the ad that I posted was put on a vintage machines FB group by one of the members (not me!) with a comment of "You don't see one of these everyday!" and one of the local members came and got it.
    ArchaicArcane is offline  
    Old 09-13-2015, 01:00 PM
      #38  
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2012
    Posts: 673
    Default

    Originally Posted by miriam
    I didn't know the 15s did zz.
    I don't believe anyone said they did. Perhaps I should have said "spiffy."
    Manalto is offline  
    Old 09-13-2015, 01:16 PM
      #39  
    Super Member
     
    ThayerRags's Avatar
     
    Join Date: May 2011
    Location: Frederick, OK
    Posts: 2,031
    Default

    I picked up a Singer 431G in June, and I have used it one time. (My wife has used it one time also.) It got into a narrow jeans leg to mend a torn knee for me without having to take out the side seam. Although it saved me some work with that repair, at the rate that I’ve been using it, I’m glad that an old Singer 538 Stylist and an old Singer 834 Stylist took turns doing its work for nine years, or I could never have afforded the 431G. I’ve retired the 538 and 834. They earned their keep.

    My wife’s go-to machines (one at home, one at the shop) are both Singer 401A machines. Between the two of us, we have 5 of them so that we’re never without one. I have a 403A as a backup for the backups too. Her quilting machine (piecing and FMQ) is a Singer 301A. My go-to machine for household-type sewing is a Singer 319W Treadle. About all of the household work that I do is mend jeans, including crotch seam repairs, reattaching the hip pocket corners, and reattaching belt loops. The 401A would do all of that for me, but I don’t have one set up as a treadle yet (have a 401G to experiment with someday), and I like to sew on treadles.

    CD in Oklahoma
    Attached Thumbnails machine584_05.jpg  

    Last edited by ThayerRags; 09-13-2015 at 01:31 PM. Reason: Added a photo.
    ThayerRags is offline  
    Related Topics
    Thread
    Thread Starter
    Forum
    Replies
    Last Post
    Mom3
    For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
    5
    02-03-2013 08:34 PM
    Cindy2201
    For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
    4
    11-16-2012 01:57 PM
    libber
    Main
    1
    10-13-2012 07:24 PM
    pinkberrykay
    For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
    9
    02-14-2012 12:01 PM
    Crazy Quiltin Robin
    Pictures
    9
    06-20-2011 09:50 AM

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off



    FREE Quilting Newsletter