Manufacturers need to wise up on what quilters want.
#71
Senior Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Burke, Va
Posts: 344
I know this is pretty much off topic, but I was in total shock a couple weeks ago when Baby Lock unveiled its new "Ovation" serger - a serger that apparently costs around $6,000 !!! I mean, come on already. A serger to me is a utility machine. I don't need a bigger throat and a multitude of stitches on my serger. I have a $200 serger that does everything I need it to do. Granted, mine doesn't have a cover stitch, but unless you're a designer, how much are you really using that type of stitch? I almost posted on their Facebook page that the only people who are going to rush out to buy this one are designers/people in business who can write it off on their taxes!
#72
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Iowa
Posts: 816
You don't need to be able to! Just cover them with an index card that is taped down well.
(Honestly, on my modern machine, my darning foot floats high enough that half the time I forget to drop the feed dogs and don't even notice. Because the foot isn't putting much pressure on the fabric, my movements are stronger than the feed dogs movements. So you could even just try that.)
(Honestly, on my modern machine, my darning foot floats high enough that half the time I forget to drop the feed dogs and don't even notice. Because the foot isn't putting much pressure on the fabric, my movements are stronger than the feed dogs movements. So you could even just try that.)
#73
Me!! I use my mirror function alot - especially when doing applique and need my blanket stitch to go the other way. I also use the alphabet quite a bit. Just depends on what you want to make. I have the Janome 6600P and I love it!
#74
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Nawth o' Boston
Posts: 1,879
http://www.wowquilts.com which can stretch powerful straight-stitch machines up to 18" for $2,000.
They used to make their own but no longer do.
I couldn't find anything else about how to to it yourself.
#76
Super Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Dallas area, Texas, USA
Posts: 3,042
Belfrybat,
The 201 is a great machine, but it doesn't like to do FMQ at all! I love my 1936 Singer 201 for piecing quilts and straight line walking foot quilting, has 8" of throat space. My machine can be either a hand crank or a treadle, much prefer to treadle it. The grand kids were piecing crumb blocks and they like to hand crank best of all, the hearts is a magnet that they use for their 1/4" seam guide.
Sharon
The 201 is a great machine, but it doesn't like to do FMQ at all! I love my 1936 Singer 201 for piecing quilts and straight line walking foot quilting, has 8" of throat space. My machine can be either a hand crank or a treadle, much prefer to treadle it. The grand kids were piecing crumb blocks and they like to hand crank best of all, the hearts is a magnet that they use for their 1/4" seam guide.
Sharon
As for the machine, I think we're comparing apples and oranges. My 201-2, dating to 1940, has been motorized since it came out of the factory. I was not aware that it came in crank or treadle models. Mine has a solid hand wheel, so would not accommodate a crank. I don't even know if it could be converted to a treadle. There are people who do free motion with treadle machines, but I'm not I'm not all that coordinated! Treadling while doing fmq would remind me of the old trick of trying to pat your your head and rub your tummy at the same time. I can't even imagine doing it with a crank, unless I had someone do the cranking for me, because I need both hands to move the fabric.
In any case, the 201-2 does just fine for fmq. I found it a little tricky to get the tension just right, and it demands the same thread top and bottom, but once she and I came to an understanding about that she's giving me the same pretty stitches that she does sewing straight. I love this machine!
Okay, now I've done a bit of research, and here's a site that lists the 201-1 as a "natural born" treadle, and the 201-4 as the "natural born" hand crank. Interesting! http://blog.sew-classic.com/2008/11/...ne-review.aspx That writer agrees with you that they are less than ideal for FMQ because of the horizontal bobbin, but to the extent that many new machines have horizontal bobbins, I'm not sure that would count as a reason to dismiss it.
#77
I absolutely agree. I spent a terrifying amount of money (for me) on a Janome 7700 because it seemed to be the only way to get a machine that would reliably do FMQ (and I'd looked hard for alternative options, old and new). It's a wonderful machine and I don't regret buying it, but it does far more than I need. But as other people have said, the point is that the manufacturers want to part us from our money: if they can get me to spend 1400 pounds on facilities I don't need, why would they produce the simpler machine for half the price? Though I actually think that the latter might make them more money, because many more people might decide they could afford it.
#78
May I suggest checking out this machine. Made in the USA. Meet the designer this summer and I think this will be the one I get. He uses parts that are available at retail stores like auto parts stores and home improvement stores. Very basic machine, no stitch regulator (but may be on the drawing table), but sturdy and VERY easy to use. I know very little about free motion quilting, but I was able to use the machine after 10 minutes of quick instructions. www.sunshine16.com is the web address.
#79
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Camarillo, CA
Posts: 4,600
I have just the machine the OP is talking about -- a Brother PQ1500S. It has a 10" throat, straight stitch, pin feed, needle up/down, and I love the push button thread cutter. Amazon has it listed for $668.00, but I got mine on E-Bay for only $250.00. I don't think the seller knew what he had. But anyway, if you really want a machine with few bells and whistles, I can certainly recommend this one or it's first cousin, the Juki 2010.
Or if you want to go old school, consider the Singer 201 -- lot's of space to work on that machine. http://blog.sew-classic.com/2008/11/...ne-review.aspx
Or if you want to go old school, consider the Singer 201 -- lot's of space to work on that machine. http://blog.sew-classic.com/2008/11/...ne-review.aspx
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Psychomomquilter
General Chit-Chat (non-quilting talk)
144
02-11-2011 12:46 PM
Favorite Fabrics
Links and Resources
2
08-25-2009 05:56 AM