Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums >
  • Main
  • For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
  • Comparing Kenmore 3/4 size, Featherweight or 301? >
  • Comparing Kenmore 3/4 size, Featherweight or 301?

  • Comparing Kenmore 3/4 size, Featherweight or 301?

    Old 08-24-2014, 03:22 PM
      #1  
    Junior Member
    Thread Starter
     
    Join Date: Mar 2014
    Posts: 172
    Default Comparing Kenmore 3/4 size, Featherweight or 301?

    Hi all,
    I have a Featherweight that I take to my quilting group but am wondering whether I "need" something tougher, maybe one of the portable Kenmores like a 1040, or a Singer 301. I like my Featherweight but you know how this addiction is... I always wonder if i need more machines. Do any of you have suggestions about whether to add to my portable collection? I have three other Kenmores that stay in cabinets, so, no shortage of options at home.
    Ila in Denver
    iadhikari is offline  
    Old 08-24-2014, 03:53 PM
      #2  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2013
    Location: Centralia, WA, USA
    Posts: 4,890
    Default

    You're not likely to get too many people telling you not to get more machines around here.
    You have to make up your own mind. Ask yourself what your likes and dislikes are for your featherweight and what features you might want that it doesn't have or that another machine might do better. A 301 isn't going to weigh much more and shares the same bobbins as your featherweight. I think it's a slant shank machine so feet won't interchange though. I don't recall seeing too many people complaining that their featherweights are fragile. They're tiny but they seem to hold up well. I'm not familiar enough with the Kenmores to know if you would like one better or not.
    That or just go out and buy at least one of each so you can try them all.
    Rodney
    Rodney is offline  
    Old 08-24-2014, 04:11 PM
      #3  
    Junior Member
    Thread Starter
     
    Join Date: Mar 2014
    Posts: 172
    Default

    No, my Featherweight is not fragile. It's a little tank. I love it -- I just worry about larger pieces of quilt tops feeding through with those tiny little feed dogs. Once my blocks are pieced on the FW, I do the rest of the assembly on a Kenmore in a cabinet. So, I think your comment has made me realize that what I want is a portable machine that can handle larger chunks of piecework, if that makes sense. Depending on what stage of quilt assembly I'm at, I might want something heavier, but not too heavy to drag to my car... a 301, then... maybe.
    iadhikari is offline  
    Old 08-24-2014, 04:47 PM
      #4  
    Banned
     
    Join Date: Aug 2014
    Location: Victorian Sweatshop Forum
    Posts: 4,096
    Default

    Lots of people love those little 3/4 size Kenmores. They start at the 1030 and go up for 4 or 5 models, each adding a new feature or two.

    Cari
    Cari-in-Oly is offline  
    Old 08-24-2014, 05:02 PM
      #5  
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2014
    Posts: 384
    Default

    I think there's a kenmore 1020 as well but never seen one. I have few, 301, and a 3/4 kenmore. I haven't sewn on any exclusively but one bee a lot of the quilters are using fw, another sewin a quilter has a painted 301..never seen the kenmore being used..seems like newer machines after tha tut all it takes is one person to show up with something cool...my aunt uses her fw for binding seems like and she hasn't had a problem. Don't think I'd try quilting on mine since I do bigger quilts but might try a baby quilt sometime. All I do at quilt thingies us piece and sometimes a rag quilt
    quilt938 is offline  
    Old 08-24-2014, 05:03 PM
      #6  
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: Jul 2014
    Posts: 384
    Default

    The little kenmore is still small would prob have more room with the 301
    quilt938 is offline  
    Old 08-25-2014, 06:27 AM
      #7  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2012
    Posts: 8,091
    Default

    A good lightweight 3/4 size machine is a Japanese clone of the Singer 99K-10. They are made from aluminum and are the same as the 99s but don't weigh any more than the FWs. They have more room under the arch, stronger motors and share the same feet and accessories. The only supply difference is they use Class 66 bobbins and are top loading. Many folks don't like the top loading part. Me ... I prefer it.

    These machines can be seen badged as Bantams or just named as my SEWMOR 303 is:
    [ATTACH=CONFIG]488984[/ATTACH]
    Notice the feather through the logo.

    These are what I'd go for if I wanted a 3/4 sized carry around machine. Oh ... right, I already have one

    Joe
    Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_5138.JPG
Views:	708
Size:	216.4 KB
ID:	488984  
    J Miller is offline  
    Old 08-25-2014, 10:17 AM
      #8  
    Super Member
     
    oldtnquiltinglady's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Aug 2011
    Location: Lafayette, TN
    Posts: 1,204
    Default

    Joe, you're right about the Spartan. I have one that is beautiful and light and sews like a dream. I use it when I am holding classes; let the ladies have their choice, FW, 301, Spartan, 99k, and new Janome (if I take on that many students at one sitting.). My room gets crowded quickly.

    And, yes, I do see the feather. But I had to go back and really look.
    oldtnquiltinglady is offline  
    Old 08-25-2014, 11:05 AM
      #9  
    Power Poster
     
    Join Date: Mar 2011
    Location: Somewhere
    Posts: 15,506
    Default

    The Kenmore does more stitches.... I love the little 185s 99s and Spartan machines, too. I have a little Domestic machine that only weighs about 10 or 11 lbs - it is a neat little machine - it runs backwards. I have a 3/4 Montgomery Ward that does zz, too. Why be so mainstream - there are lots of little machines out there. Have fun and enjoy what comes your way. FW has the big advantage of status.

    Last edited by miriam; 08-25-2014 at 11:09 AM.
    miriam is offline  
    Old 08-25-2014, 11:42 AM
      #10  
    Power Poster
     
    Join Date: Mar 2011
    Location: Somewhere
    Posts: 15,506
    Default

    Here is a link to a very ancient post - it is a fun read:
    http://www.quiltingboard.com/vintage...e-t185449.html
    miriam is offline  
    Related Topics
    Thread
    Thread Starter
    Forum
    Replies
    Last Post
    PumpkinSundae
    Main
    3
    04-08-2013 05:43 AM
    judyjo
    Main
    12
    11-05-2010 07:21 PM
    stevendebbie25
    Main
    0
    10-24-2010 02:35 AM
    sewcrazygirl
    Main
    1
    02-27-2010 07:04 PM

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off


    FREE Quilting Newsletter