201 vs 15-91

Thread Tools
 
Old 03-10-2015, 05:40 AM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
sjdal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 181
Default 201 vs 15-91

In another thread, Vridar said he uses the 201 for general sewing and the 15-91 for heavy sewing. Is the 15-91 better for this type of work? I always thought they were very similar machines? I have just bought a 201, but haven't had the time to put it through its paces.
sjdal is offline  
Old 03-10-2015, 07:22 AM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
Vridar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: NW MO
Posts: 591
Default

Originally Posted by sjdal View Post
In another thread, Vridar said he uses the 201 for general sewing and the 15-91 for heavy sewing. Is the 15-91 better for this type of work? I always thought they were very similar machines? I have just bought a 201, but haven't had the time to put it through its paces.
I think the difference lies in the thread travel and thread handling. Both should have the same punching power, IMHO. There recently was a discussion on ISMACS concerning jean thread and 201 conflict, or at least the 66 type bobbin system. One poster indicated the spacing between the bobbin case and plate is not conducive to heavier threads. Others had other solutions to heavier thread incompatibilities. Also, not confirmed by me, is the theory the extra 90 degree thread travel of the 201 hinders heavier thread use. The 91 has a straight thread travel from bobbin to lock stitch. The 201 and 91 motors are the same. There may not be substantial difference between the two, but in my mind, I repeat, in my mind, I perceive the 15 being a stronger "thread injector" than the 201. Also, the 201 is such a fine (by two definitions) sewer, I save it for less strenuous use.

Congratulations on the 201 purchase. You will love it.

Last edited by Vridar; 03-10-2015 at 07:33 AM.
Vridar is offline  
Old 03-10-2015, 08:42 AM
  #3  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 9,319
Default

The 15 is also known for better tension control because it has a vertical bobbin assembly vs. the drop in of the 201.
Candace is offline  
Old 03-10-2015, 09:41 PM
  #4  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 786
Default

I don't have a 201 but I do have a 66 and a 15-91. The 15-91 has handled different weights without much complaint. The only thread that needed some upper tension adjustment was the upholstery thread. Not so with the 66, anything that's a thicker than regular sewing thread affects both the upper and lower tensions. It's easier to switch to the 15-91 than mess around with the tensions.
pennycandy is offline  
Old 03-11-2015, 02:22 AM
  #5  
Power Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 15,506
Default

I prefer any old 15 type over a lot of other machines. I have a 201 and a 301 and a 401 and the 66 and 99 etc. but I still prefer the 15s. I also like the old mechanical all metal machines with the front tension, the bobbin in a case and while a centered needle on a zz is preferred that kind of machine will sew about anything.
miriam is offline  
Old 03-11-2015, 02:42 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
Mitch's mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: TN
Posts: 1,443
Default

A 201 is a rotary hook where a 15 is an oscillating hook. Some say it doesn't matter. Depending on what you are doing it probably doesn't.
Mitch's mom is offline  
Old 03-11-2015, 04:29 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Victorian Sweatshop
Posts: 863
Default

I use my 15 daily. The 15-91 just seems louder and it isn't such a pleasure to sew on because of the noise. Nothing unusual or wrong with it but I enjoy the 15.

The 201 sews everything but she just seems so elegant. So I use her for precise piecing and clothing, except jeans.
redmadder is offline  
Old 03-11-2015, 04:51 AM
  #8  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
sjdal's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 181
Default

Thanks, everyone who took the time to answer. I know I will love my new machine, along with the others that have joined my collection.
sjdal is offline  
Old 03-11-2015, 11:36 AM
  #9  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 490
Default

I love my 201 that belonged to my mom. I have sewn thick canvas with it.
granny64 is offline  
Old 03-11-2015, 12:03 PM
  #10  
Power Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 15,506
Default

Either one is a very good machine.
miriam is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kas
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
17
10-12-2021 10:07 AM
flawhoopi
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
6
12-22-2013 11:29 PM
Carol34446
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
1
09-16-2013 10:53 AM
harrishwhippets
Main
8
02-25-2011 08:57 PM
blueribbontoes
Member Swaps and Round/Row Robins
3992
08-02-2010 11:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



FREE Quilting Newsletter