I see a mixture of personal views overshadowing the interpretation of copyright. Sure we can all Google it and make our own decisions based on our personal ethics but when you allow those personal ethics to decide that your personal interpretation is what the law intended, well, that's when we cross the line into thinking we are a pseudo-expert and have the ability or enough knowledge to make an eronneous statement of fact. Unless you actually have a law degree and specialize in intellectual property, the opinions expressed here are just that. Opinions.