I just got a Singer 201-2 (direct drive) so I have not sewn or quilted on it yet. DH researched it and said that the Singer 15-91 (also direct drive) would be better for quilting because it can handle thicker thread then the Singer 201. He just set up the singer 15-91 we have for quilting and it indeed quilts very nice. I have heard the Singer 201-2 because it is a direct drive is better for quilting but I am sure one with a belt would work too. Replacing a belt is not very hard. I am sure Billy or some one else on here can help you. The singer 201 has a larger space under the arm then a Singer 15 so I would think that with larger quilts would be a definite plus.
We also have a Singer 201 that has a belt. It was made in England. DH took the motor off because it did not work and put it in my threadle base. I really like how it treadles but the problem is I can not fold it down into the cabinet because the machine is too tall.
We also have a Singer 301 and that we enjoy for paper piecing. It is a smaller machine and portable. I would think the Singer 201 or 15 would be a better option for quilting as there is more space under the arm and the machines are much heavier.
Originally Posted by annesthreads
I've posted a couple of questions about the Singer 201, and someone suggested that I should be asking here. So in case you haven't seen my other threads:
Any dates/model that are particularly good/ to be avoided? I've worked out that many of those available in the UK are the 201-3, with a drive belt rather than a potted motor (had never heard that term till yesterday - am learning fast!) . What about the 1960s brown one - is that as good as the older ones?
I want a machine that I can use for free motion quilting, as my expensive modern one is *!*! at it. Have people used the 201 for FMQ? I understand that a disadvantage is that the bobbins are small, but the 301 was apparently not sold in Europe, so I don't have that alternative, and there don't seem to be as many 15s around.
The drive belt on the one I'm looking at doesn't look great. Is replacing it a straightforward job?
Many thanks!