The uproar over the boxer ad is more insulting than the ad almost.
Jingle bells being turned into a "naughty" topic was around when I was knee high to a grasshopper. It's not some new idea.
At the same time, any ad featuring a woman must have her sexy, no matter what is being sold. Even Flo is presented to be sexy to sell insurance. Victoria's Secret has commercials on year round that are far more explicit.
Furthermore, women are set in absolutely unreasonable settings - I don't bleed windshield washer fluid, nor do I know anyone who does. Both Janet Jackson and Miley Cyrus performed with males who were equally responsible for the acts, yet the men are tolerated and the women are vilified.
Both issues are accepted in most cases, and complaints on the far extremes only target the women for two party stunts that are far more sexual than this.
But, this ad is causing outrage. Really? It's hardly the most sexual commercial out now. You see nothing.
It's tacky at worst. But, I still find it hilarious.