Old 04-27-2015, 05:41 PM
  #19  
manicmike
Super Member
 
manicmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,850
Default

Originally Posted by oreo1912
it is great for fmq
That's a little surprising. I thought free motion work was the 201s one failing: They're said to have tension problems due to the thread path of the horizontal bobbin.
I thought the vertical bobbin machines (particularly 15-88 to 15-91) were the preferred machine for FMQ.

Am I incorrect? Have to admit I didn't bother trying this with my 201s because of what I'd read, but very happy to be corrected as it would mean the 201 is great at everything except sleeves (where I need a free arm machine).
manicmike is offline