Alas, I think you're preaching to the choir. I agree with everything you said, except I wouldn't cut off the comparison to today's machines at $500. I don't begrudge those who want to put computerized embroidery on their work, but it's an exercise of choice, not skill, and can't compare to the subtlety of hand work. When the circuit board of a computerized machine fails or goes wonky, it's not a simple fix. By contrast, many old iron machines have functioned perfectly for 100 years. To my eye, a solidly built machine of any vintage is beautiful; it doesn't look dated, it looks classic. Oops, now I'm preaching to the choir!
I agree about the 201. I also have a soft spot for the 101 despite its wimpy motor, its lines are so elegant.
Last edited by Manalto; 10-27-2015 at 07:14 AM.