I feel sorry for middle-aged sewing machines!
#31
Super Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Round Rock,Texas
Posts: 6,135
Most of my machines are older than I am. I only own 1 new computerized machine. All of the others are mechanicals. I frequently use treadle machines. I don't really like the plastic wonder wiz kid, however the 10" throat space is lovely.
Sharon
Sharon
#32
I have one old 60's Universal that I use alllllllll the time,i've had it for 45 years , it straight stitches, button holes and ziggages all with a click of the dial, stitch length adjusted, foot drop, little maintanence, oil and a new belt everyonce in a while, love it. Have my babies 1942 221 & & 1941 228 also and a 60's singer that was Moms, if my universal ever goes down, i'll use it.
#33
I have an older Bernina that I love. She lives at my church and we use her for our charity quilts. I wouldn't give up that machine for anything. Her throat is large enough for quilting children's and lap quilts. Everyone wants to sew with her every week.
#34
I just got a Morse Fotomastic (1967 near as I can tell) and besides being sooo heavy, I am amazed at what this thing has/does - and the original receipt is still in it showing bought for total of $314 - at $12.16/mo for 24 months after a down payment of $11+. I also have some neat computer sewing/emb machines - but besides being astounded at all of the features called "embroidery" at that time, I would not be surprised if this older baby outlasts most of the others I have!
Marysewfun
Marysewfun
#36
Senior Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New England
Posts: 865
Singer's quality went down, according to many people, in the 1970s and has never returned. It was also about that time that manufacturers began using plastic parts inside the machine, and those wear out long before metal will.
I think I read that Singer now makes Pfaffs. Does anyone know for sure? I have two Pfaffs but, if that's true, won't be buying another.
I think I read that Singer now makes Pfaffs. Does anyone know for sure? I have two Pfaffs but, if that's true, won't be buying another.
#37
Super Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Heart of Colorado's majestic mountains!
Posts: 6,026
Ladies, it's called "planned obsolesence". It is obvious in all of our appliances. I had a Kenmore dryer that lasted 32 years before a simple heating element was no longer available. I purchased a new one and the installer said it was good for 5-7 years. Seven years later I had to buy another one. The same is true for the new sewing machines with plastic, nylon and other non metal parts. Those parts wear out or warp and cause lots of problems. I have 3 1960's era Singers and a 40 year old Bernina and no problems. I like my vintage stuff!
#38
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 397
My across the street sewing buday has a 40 year old Kenmore that she wouldn't trade for a new one with all the doodads. I have 2 older Singers that I alternate using. The one I'm using now is fairly new at age 10. I would not trade it for a computerized machine. The machine that I wish i still had is my 1960 New Home. I loved that machine, but it was broken during a government move.
#39
This is such an interesting thread... I agree that quality isn't always what it used to be. On the other hand, the dramatic uptick of new features over the last decade has changed the sewing industry in my mind.
It seems like the current marketing strategy is to hook buyers on your brand and then keep adding features to make us want to upgrade. And I have to say it is working judging by how passionate some of us are about our machines!
It seems like the current marketing strategy is to hook buyers on your brand and then keep adding features to make us want to upgrade. And I have to say it is working judging by how passionate some of us are about our machines!
#40
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: near Peoria Illinois
Posts: 1,638
I don't know so much that the quality intentionally deteriorated so much as that the nylon/plastic gears were "the brand new wave of the future" and seemed like a vast improvement in making things more light weight.
What was not understood was that these would not have the continued strength over time and usage.
I don't think anyone expected the degree of breakage from deterioration of the materials or the fact that replacement parts would not be readily available due to constant upgrades with different parts being made.
What was not understood was that these would not have the continued strength over time and usage.
I don't think anyone expected the degree of breakage from deterioration of the materials or the fact that replacement parts would not be readily available due to constant upgrades with different parts being made.
So I believe that that era 60's 70's early 80's that depended on the plastics to do heavy work, is a slump in the workmanship of the domestic sewing machine. Just saying.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
SingerSewer
Main
10
06-22-2013 06:24 AM
amandasgramma
General Chit-Chat (non-quilting talk)
13
12-28-2010 01:37 PM