Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums > Main
Choosing Between a Singer 301 and a 401/advice please >

Choosing Between a Singer 301 and a 401/advice please

Choosing Between a Singer 301 and a 401/advice please

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-25-2011, 05:23 PM
  #51  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: WI
Posts: 706
Default

Originally Posted by irishrose
My 301 was advertised as a heavy duty machine, which it is not, but it is capable of any household sewing. It doesn't need to be babied because it is light. The gears and inner working are all full size and good steel. Only the housing is aluminum. Mine came with four layers of leather under the presser foot with rows of stitching.. My daughter was fascinated and played with it. I had her stop. It is not an industrial machine. If I want to sew four layers of leather - and I have, I'll use the Elna or Necchi. The Elna loves that kind of sewing. I haven't tried with the Necchi.
Necchi depending on the model is a heavy duty machine- however- let me stress again- just because that is said does not mean your particular machine has been handled the way it should have been by a previous owner and care should be given when testing it.
writerwomen is offline  
Old 07-25-2011, 06:31 PM
  #52  
Senior Member
 
angiecub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 509
Default

You will need an FMQ foot, but you can probably get one for 8.00 on ebay. That's what I paid for the one that fits my 401. By the way, I love my 401. My service man says the 301 and the 401 have the same motor, so they should both "purr" the same.
angiecub is offline  
Old 07-26-2011, 07:28 AM
  #53  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cadillac, MI
Posts: 6,487
Default

writerwomen, ny Necchi is a pre 1950 model. I haven't used it for anything except piecing. If I had heavy duty sewing to do, I think I'd pull the Admiral out of it's hiding place. It has a Japanese motor that seems stronger than the Necchi's.

The 301 has a 1/4" seam guide screwed on, so it does piecing and the Necchi does HSTs and such. It's working out well. The guide will come off when it's time for FMQ. That is the 301's specialty in my house.
irishrose is offline  
Old 07-26-2011, 07:47 AM
  #54  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: North Carolina - But otherwise, NOTW
Posts: 7,940
Default

Originally Posted by hobbykat1955
Yes it is a metal holding case that comes out and bobbin is put in that...
I have a 1951 Black 301 which did not come w/bobbin case...picked it up at a tag sale for 30.00 so I didn't mind buying case for it...for 69.00. Runs beautiful after a ckup with Singer repair man who does vintage machines.
He told me the 301 is the best gear driven machine Singer made and he'd buy that even before a featherweight...He was right it purrs and what a great stitch.

A few mths after buying that I found a 2 Toned beige 1954 301A for 120.00 on Craigs List in cabinet.. I was hooked on my 301 but I find this 301A I like even better even though they are the same machine other then where they were made...That baby purrs even smoother and I discovered the cabinet came equipped with knee pedal which I use and love. So get your 301 versus the 401 you won't regret it.
I also have a 1951 301, and after some cleanup and heavy oiling sessions (she was stiff as a board when I first got her...hadn't been used in years!), she sews like a dream!! I haven't done any FMQ on her, and I think it would be a little difficult for a large quilt. But I would certainly try it for a smaller quilt.
jljack is offline  
Old 07-26-2011, 09:29 AM
  #55  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Madison WI
Posts: 42
Default

In surfing around in images on google I came across this .It tells you what you are quetioning and more about which vintage Singer is best in her opinion for FMQ. Put the follo9wing in google and it should come up for you. I just googled it myself and it comes up as eBay Guides Free Motion Quilting with vintage singer sewing machines click on that and it is what I have listed below. It's Excellent. Do read before you decide.

Free Motion Quilting with Vintage Singer Sewing Machine
by: karenquiltstexas
sringh is offline  
Old 07-26-2011, 10:27 AM
  #56  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cadillac, MI
Posts: 6,487
Default

Nice article, but it has an error. The 301 weighs 17 pounds, not 12 and does not dance around when FMQ. The feet kept it grounded. It's gear driven and strong enough for FMQ. Also has the vertical bobbin she prefers and the 401 doesn't. I do agree that a FW is not a FMQ machine.
irishrose is offline  
Old 07-27-2011, 04:38 AM
  #57  
Super Member
 
GailG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Louisiana
Posts: 6,764
Default

My mom purchased a 301 in the fifties (not really sure what year).I sewed on it before I graduated from high school in '58 and through college ('62). That machine is still working beautifully today. I bought a 404 in '62. It, too, is still alive and healthy. I don't know what the differences are between the 301 abd tge 401. But I do know that both of our machines are straight stitchers. I had purchased attachments for zigzagging and for buttonholes.
GailG is offline  
Old 07-28-2011, 06:03 AM
  #58  
Super Member
 
ThayerRags's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Frederick, OK
Posts: 2,031
Default

Here’s another vote for “one of each”. In our home sewing area, my wife has used her 401A for years, and pulled her Featherweight out from time to time for straight stitching, until she began using my 301A. Now, she has both the 401A and 301A set up full-time and the 221 stays in the case most of the time. She does straight stitching and FMQ on the 301A, and zigzag or other stitches on the 401A.

CD in Oklahoma

Bear's Home Sewing Area
[ATTACH=CONFIG]232758[/ATTACH]
Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version

Name:	Attachment-232752.jpe
Views:	1926
Size:	58.7 KB
ID:	232758  
ThayerRags is offline  
Old 07-29-2011, 06:49 PM
  #59  
Member
 
pamg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 36
Default

I have a 401 and wouldn't give it up for any thing.....my Mom got it new back in the 50's and still works great
pamg is offline  
Old 12-10-2019, 10:05 PM
  #60  
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 5
Default Looking for the Darning foot You Mentioned

Originally Posted by thepolyparrot View Post
This is the best darning foot for slant shank machines that I've ever tried:
http://shop.sew-classic.com/Singer-S...-SCF384037.htm

No problem at all using it on the 301. I have a vintage darning foot that was made specifically for the 301, but I like working with this one better.

Great visibility and very quiet. I have about ten different kinds of darning feet including some that are very old and some that are virtually all plastic and pretty expensive - but my favorite for the low shank costs $3 and this one for slants costs $6. I wish they made this model in a low shank style.

After you've been quilting for a while, this foot almost disappears and you don't even notice it being there!
Hello Pollyparrot,

I clicked on the link to the darning foot you recommended. I know this is an old thread so perhaps Sew Classic doesn't sell this one anymore? The link opens their site but doesn't show a darning foot. I checked out their slant feet. They sell two darning feet. One has a metal foot and the other a clear foot. Are either of them the one you like? Thank you.
kendall2 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
karenpatrick
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
13
05-20-2020 11:42 AM
mercer63
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
14
07-02-2012 11:21 AM
tatavw01
Links and Resources
1
01-30-2012 09:14 PM
AshleyO
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
19
04-06-2011 09:41 AM
Baby Catcher
Main
3
02-25-2010 12:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



FREE Quilting Newsletter