Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums >
  • Main
  • Inexpensive sewing machine with wider throat? >
  • Inexpensive sewing machine with wider throat?

  • Inexpensive sewing machine with wider throat?

    Thread Tools
     
    Old 08-07-2012, 11:57 AM
      #11  
    Power Poster
     
    Jingle's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Dec 2009
    Location: Outside St. Louis
    Posts: 38,213
    Default

    I have two straight stitch only machines with 9" throats and I can quilt large quilts with ease on either one of them. I have quilted 79 quilts by machine quilting. Some were done on machines with smaller throats. Practice is the key to doing anything.
    Jingle is offline  
    Old 08-07-2012, 12:47 PM
      #12  
    Member
    Thread Starter
     
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Location: Midland, Texas
    Posts: 94
    Default

    Well, I posted a reply earlier but guess I didn't hit the right button. I really appreciate all the suggestions. I'm definitely keeping an eye on craigslist and will for sure check out the books mentioned. I've learned so much here already and can't tell you how much I appreciate everyone's help.
    texas8823 is offline  
    Old 08-07-2012, 01:11 PM
      #13  
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: May 2012
    Posts: 911
    Default

    I gave up on doing teh long lines with a home machine, and bought used industrails 11 1/2" x 6". I now have 4 of these machines, There prices was 100$ , 125 $ 50 $ and 55$, The newest is a 1940, the oldest is a 1922 walking foot...

    These machines are showing up on C/L, often cheaper than a home machine, because so many are afriad of using them..

    P.S. my average time doing 12 straight 8 foot sew line and 12 @ 7 foot was 8 hrs, now it's 2 hrs and no hurting back, no cusing the machine

    Last edited by xxxxxxxxxx; 08-07-2012 at 01:13 PM.
    xxxxxxxxxx is offline  
    Old 08-07-2012, 02:22 PM
      #14  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2008
    Location: The Finger Lakes of upstate NY
    Posts: 3,468
    Default

    If you have a good sewing machine sales/repair shop within a reasonable drive, I'd contact them. You might be able to get a used machine for a good price. For the last machine I bought, I knew what I wanted (a Bernina model that had been discontinued) so called the local dealer. Although they said that model didn't come in for trade often, they added my name to a list. They called back within a couple of months.
    peaceandjoy is offline  
    Old 08-07-2012, 05:17 PM
      #15  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2009
    Location: SC
    Posts: 1,909
    Default

    Or you might also check at JoAnn's for a SInger Confidence Quilter...they're often on sale for about $300 and they do a good job. (Yes, I know Singer has had a lot of bad press lately, much of it deserved.) I have one among my herd, but I don't often FMQ on any of them as I have a LA.
    momto5 is offline  
    Old 08-08-2012, 03:07 AM
      #16  
    Super Member
     
    jitkaau's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Aug 2010
    Location: Australia
    Posts: 4,116
    Default

    The Brother 1500s has a 9" throat. It is a straight stitch only and makes a very nice quilting stitch.The presser foot is adjustable for pressure and it is easy to adjust the depth of the feed dogs. I think Juki made these for Brother. They are not computerised and are very heavy. I like mine very much and think you can get one for around $500 in the States.
    jitkaau is offline  
    Old 08-08-2012, 03:44 AM
      #17  
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: Jun 2011
    Posts: 976
    Default

    Originally Posted by BellaBoo
    I have the Brother 1500. It has a very wide throat space. It's a great machine for quilting. It is built to last for decades like the vintage machines. Now they are selling new between $600 - $700. I don't know of any other large throat space machine for under that price.
    Juki makes a comperable machine to the Brother 1500 for near the same price. These two are the only two on the market with the larger throat at this low of a price....I'm saving up for either one of these. I just don't understand why it is so much more expensive to have a larger throat space...its something we ALL want (hello manufacturers)
    Steady Stiching is offline  
    Old 08-08-2012, 04:47 AM
      #18  
    Member
    Thread Starter
     
    Join Date: Feb 2011
    Location: Midland, Texas
    Posts: 94
    Default

    After my post yesterday, I went home and checked out an older Singer I had purchased through Craigslist last year hoping it was a model 201. It's a Model 15-91 BUT it has a wider and taller throat than the machine I'm using now. So I'm going to clean it up and get it running (hopefully) and use it until I can afford one of the newer machines. Have to admit that I'm pretty excited about sewing on one of these again. My Mom had something similar to it that I learned to sew on. This will be fun!!!
    texas8823 is offline  
    Old 08-08-2012, 05:22 AM
      #19  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Aug 2010
    Location: Kansas City, Missouri
    Posts: 1,040
    Default

    Originally Posted by Shelbie
    You might consider a vintage Singer 201. Although the harp space is about an inch shorter than my Janome 6500 (which has the larger harp) it is higher and I find that I can quilt a King sized quilt on it. The feed dogs drop for FM quilting and it is a fast powerful machine. It stitches much better than my Janome 6500 that I paid $2000 for. My Singer 201 was a free machine from an estate sale and came in a cabinet. Check Craig's List (Kijiji in Canada) for old black Singers which often sell in the $100 range.
    I have to agree here. I have a Singer 201 and I just love it. The harp area is nice and big and by puddling the quilt it is fairly easy. Of course if I were quilting anything larger than a twin size I would quilt in quadrants.
    Blackberry is offline  
    Old 08-08-2012, 06:13 AM
      #20  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Oct 2010
    Location: Prescott Valley, AZ
    Posts: 1,329
    Default

    I recommend you look for a vintage machine, possibly a Singer model 15. The harp was not necessarily a lot wider, but the open area was taller than the new machines by quite a bit, which also allows more quilt to fit in the space. Computer or cam controls in the head caused it to become much bigger around, resulting in less space between the head and the base.
    ShirlinAZ is offline  
    Related Topics
    Thread
    Thread Starter
    Forum
    Replies
    Last Post
    coachmatthewsvhs
    Main
    66
    10-24-2013 07:48 PM
    gregoryhenry
    Main
    8
    10-12-2012 07:02 AM
    2 Doods
    Pictures
    38
    03-09-2011 05:37 PM
    fabricluvr
    Main
    26
    01-08-2011 03:50 AM

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is On
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off



    FREE Quilting Newsletter