Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums >
  • Main
  • For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
  • Featherweight high costs .... why? >
  • Featherweight high costs .... why?

  • Featherweight high costs .... why?

    Thread Tools
     
    Old 09-29-2014, 08:36 PM
      #81  
    Senior Member
     
    sdhaevrsi's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Apr 2014
    Location: Idaho
    Posts: 344
    Default

    Cant find anything on google, but found a couple on ebay and think mine must be for a FW.
    sdhaevrsi is offline  
    Old 09-29-2014, 08:47 PM
      #82  
    Banned
     
    Join Date: Aug 2014
    Location: Victorian Sweatshop Forum
    Posts: 4,096
    Default

    Originally Posted by sdhaevrsi
    Yes, it has D817993 on the underside, and Simanco 136314 on the metal frame work of the brace/bracket/insert of the hole. I never thought about trying to track down anything with those. Off to Google, now.
    The first number is the serial number. The other number made it easy to trace, yes it's the model 312, the most popular of the FW tables.

    Cari
    Cari-in-Oly is offline  
    Old 09-29-2014, 09:43 PM
      #83  
    Senior Member
     
    sdhaevrsi's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Apr 2014
    Location: Idaho
    Posts: 344
    Default

    Thank you!

    How did you find that? Where did you look, or what key words?
    sdhaevrsi is offline  
    Old 09-29-2014, 10:22 PM
      #84  
    Banned
     
    Join Date: Aug 2014
    Location: Victorian Sweatshop Forum
    Posts: 4,096
    Default

    Originally Posted by sdhaevrsi
    Thank you!

    How did you find that? Where did you look, or what key words?
    The Vintage Singer Yahoo group has another group called the Singer Library where they have more files of info and one is some really good info, parts lists and pics of all the card tables. Every Yahoo group I belong to I've made it a point to read all the files so I know what's in there. When I need to know something or check on something the hard part is remembering where I read the info I'm looking for.

    Cari
    Cari-in-Oly is offline  
    Old 09-30-2014, 07:06 AM
      #85  
    Senior Member
     
    sdhaevrsi's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Apr 2014
    Location: Idaho
    Posts: 344
    Default

    Thank you, Cari. I sent you a PM.
    sdhaevrsi is offline  
    Old 10-01-2014, 09:24 AM
      #86  
    Super Member
     
    starshine's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Aug 2010
    Location: Ohio
    Posts: 2,884
    Default

    Just reading a bit on my lunch hour so didn't see all of the posts, but I asked a vendor/quilter at a quilt show why so many quilters seem to like the featherweight. She did mention the portability and light weight factors. But she also mentioned that for piecing she likes her fw because it only sews straight, and so there is less shifting of her pieces than there is with her machine that has a larger slot for a zigzag stitch. I am guessing that is maybe why it is popular with quilters especially if they are piecing shapes.
    starshine is offline  
    Old 10-01-2014, 09:30 AM
      #87  
    Senior Member
     
    sdhaevrsi's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Apr 2014
    Location: Idaho
    Posts: 344
    Default

    I love my FW. It is my main machine and has been for 20 years. Thanks to my relatively newly acquired vintage machine addiction I am now going to be testing it to the 66, 201, and hopefully soon 301 and Pfaff 130 to compare. I love how the FW sews, very smooth, quiet, easy to move/carry, and with very nice stitching. It has always made me feel good just to simply see it. Now, my other vintage machines make me feel good to look at too, so we will see...
    sdhaevrsi is offline  
    Old 10-01-2014, 12:08 PM
      #88  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Aug 2013
    Location: Springfield Oregon
    Posts: 1,481
    Default

    Anyone know online vendors that carry FW table replacement springs that keep the legs latched??
    oldsewnsew is offline  
    Old 10-01-2014, 12:27 PM
      #89  
    Power Poster
     
    Join Date: Mar 2011
    Location: Somewhere
    Posts: 15,506
    Default

    Originally Posted by starshine
    Just reading a bit on my lunch hour so didn't see all of the posts, but I asked a vendor/quilter at a quilt show why so many quilters seem to like the featherweight. She did mention the portability and light weight factors. But she also mentioned that for piecing she likes her fw because it only sews straight, and so there is less shifting of her pieces than there is with her machine that has a larger slot for a zigzag stitch. I am guessing that is maybe why it is popular with quilters especially if they are piecing shapes.
    The ss only would be that way on any vintage ss machine. I get it about hauling it around, too. I just don't love the bobbin area.
    miriam is offline  
    Old 10-01-2014, 01:47 PM
      #90  
    Super Member
     
    ThayerRags's Avatar
     
    Join Date: May 2011
    Location: Frederick, OK
    Posts: 2,031
    Default

    Maybe sewing machines are sold by the pound.

    The lighter they are, the more they cost!

    CD in Oklahoma
    ThayerRags is offline  
    Related Topics
    Thread
    Thread Starter
    Forum
    Replies
    Last Post
    deedum
    Main
    127
    10-31-2011 06:06 PM
    vicki75
    Main
    16
    10-11-2011 08:24 PM
    DonnaB
    General Chit-Chat (non-quilting talk)
    21
    06-05-2011 03:38 PM
    butterflywing
    General Chit-Chat (non-quilting talk)
    15
    01-19-2011 12:13 PM

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is Off
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off



    FREE Quilting Newsletter