So then he sends me this picture!
1 Attachment(s)
Just when you think you're through buying another machine. He sent me a picture of this Sphinx. It looks immaculate from the picture. He said she wanted $40.00 but I'm really not in the market for a hand crank. I think this may be a replica. What do you think[ATTACH=CONFIG]570449[/ATTACH]
|
It looks like a repro to me. Is that a feed dog drop button on the bed? That's a dead give away, as well as any plastic on the machine. Is the upper tension plastic? Does the serial number start with NL? IIRC NL is the repro prefix.
Cari |
from our friends across the pond ( at least from Kansas, USA) Singer Sewing......uk
[h=2]"Modern 'Nostalgia' Model 15’s[/h]From the mid 1970’s what are often referred to as ‘Nostalgia’ model 15’s were made in Taiwan and then later in China. These were made to the same design as earlier machines with the traditional black cast iron bodies and with the RAF or Sphinx decals etc. They were even supplied in the old style bentwood cases or treadle tables. The machines built at the Singer factory in Taiwan were identified by the model No. 15NL, whilst the Chinese ones are model 15CH. Although these machine look like the originals, there are subtle differences and they have a poor reputation of being lower quality machines that tend to be very noisy in use." Too bad, I wish my handcranks looked that good. |
Thanks Leon, I remembered the NL but forgot about the CH. Haha, the words "subtle differences" made me chuckle. Subtle as a freight train once you know what to look for. The repros came as a treadle in a press board cabinet and either hand crank or electric in a repro bent wood case.
Cari |
There isn't the usual serial number on the flat base. He didn't see a serial number anywhere. He'll have to go look when it's not so busy.
|
Sure looks like a replica to me. The decals are funny bright colors....
|
He said it has made in USA underneath in the cast iron body of the machine. If it's not the repop maybe someone just restored it?
|
I don't think model 15s with stitch length lever ever came in the more elaborate decals? When was the lever introduced? I don't think it was until the 201-2 and 15-91 were around 1930. Not any of the pre 1960 machines ever had a knob for the feed dogs on the bed either (it was a setting with a screw underneat). I can hardly see the knob, if at all, but if it's there, it's almost sure it's a later reproduction or a Japanese clone redone with Singer decals.
|
No Kathy, it's not an original Singer. It's a reproduction machine. I'd like to see a pic of the "made in USA". It might have had the final assembly(to be a treadle, hand crank or electric) done in the US but it's still a repro, not an original.
Cari |
Originally Posted by KathyJB
(Post 7792849)
There isn't the usual serial number on the flat base. He didn't see a serial number anywhere. He'll have to go look when it's not so busy.
http://www.singerco.com/support/machine-model-numbers shows where the model numbers are, but by the dates there it doesn't seem to apply to these machines. I think the easiest way to tell that this is a reproduction is the the drop feed, as Cari pointed out. There are several differences between the original model 15s and the reproduction models. The site Leon referred to also shows original decals at http://www.singersewinginfo.co.uk/decals/decal12/ and comparing them you can see that the original had finer details and different colors. I also noticed the lever on bobbin winder is different. Most of the originals have a fancy nose plate, where the reproductions have the striated nose plate. As Mickey2 noted the round stitch length isn't seen until after they stopped using the original Sphinx decals. A couple of other threads that talk about this machine - http://www.quiltingboard.com/vintage...a-t192988.html http://www.quiltingboard.com/main-f1...l-t146352.html Janey - Neat people never make the exciting discoveries I do. |
I also read (somewhere?) that a giveaway to chinese made repro is the wording on the top of the arm. Genuine Singers say "Singer Manufacturing Company" while the repro machines say "Singer Sewing Machine Company". As the pictured machine does.
|
Looks like a repro to me.
|
Originally Posted by OurWorkbench
(Post 7792959)
decals at http://www.singersewinginfo.co.uk/decals/decal12/ Most of the originals have a fancy nose plate, where the reproductions have the striated nose plate. Janey - Neat people never make the exciting discoveries I do. Cari |
1 Attachment(s)
Originally Posted by KathyJB
(Post 7792692)
Just when you think you're through buying another machine. He sent me a picture of this Sphinx. It looks immaculate from the picture. He said she wanted $40.00 but I'm really not in the market for a hand crank. I think this may be a replica. What do you think[ATTACH=CONFIG]570449[/ATTACH]
|
Originally Posted by Cari-in-Oly
(Post 7792989)
Janey, Singer went to the striated face plate right around 1950 or a little later. Most of the reproduction machines I've seen have the fancy face plates. There were repros of other models besides the 15.
Cari |
I sure appreciate everyone's input. I'm so glad I joined your group. :D
|
Originally Posted by RotaryQueen
(Post 7792968)
I also read (somewhere?) that a giveaway to chinese made repro is the wording on the top of the arm. Genuine Singers say "Singer Manufacturing Company" while the repro machines say "Singer Sewing Machine Company". As the pictured machine does.
|
Originally Posted by Mickey2
(Post 7793169)
I have a black cast iron 201K with "pin striped" chromed plates, the serial number dates it to 1950 spot on. Apparently Singer made an effort to keep a high standard over the years, both to build and material. It's unfortunate the newer ones hasn't kept the same. Even so, I lean towards the older machines for various reasons, I like that they are old and have a history :- )
|
Originally Posted by Grannyh67
(Post 7793122)
I believe you have a repo, this is mine. They are pretty but not as good as the original machines. I have one and it is beautiful as you can see, it doesn't sew as well as it should. Unless you just want it for looks I would stay away from it.
|
I'd consider this an original singer, just not a vintage one. Though the "Singer" company that made it is quite a bit different than the Singer company that made the 15's prior to 1955.
Saying this is not a Singer is like saying a 2017 Mustang is not a Ford. Sure it's nothing like the original Mustang, but it's still a Ford. |
My 1948 15-91 has a striated face. My 1947 201-2 has a decorative (art deco kind of) face. My 1952 201-2 has a striated face. So, I don't think there is a certain date that they changed to the striated face.
bkay |
Poor choice of words on my part. By "original", I meant vintage. Though if you think about it, the repros made in the 70s are now becoming vintage.
Cari |
Cari - isn't that the truth about what is now vintage! Kind of freaks me out, thinking the stuff I consider "normal" is now 30-40 years old and vintage to younger generations.
As we get older, the years start flying by. |
Originally Posted by Macybaby
(Post 7794015)
Cari - isn't that the truth about what is now vintage! Kind of freaks me out, thinking the stuff I consider "normal" is now 30-40 years old and vintage to younger generations.
As we get older, the years start flying by. |
Originally Posted by bkay
(Post 7793337)
My 1948 15-91 has a striated face. My 1947 201-2 has a decorative (art deco kind of) face. My 1952 201-2 has a striated face. So, I don't think there is a certain date that they changed to the striated face.
bkay Cari |
Originally Posted by Cari-in-Oly
(Post 7794133)
... But as a general guide, around 1950 is when Singers were getting the striated face plate and by 1952 most had them. Funny thing is, it also applies to Japanese clones.
Cari It's at least true when it comes to sewing machines and architecture, not so much regarding furniture, china teasets and dinner plates; they seem to have continued as a side show along with the modern trends. |
(Cari - isn't that the truth about what is now vintage! Kind of freaks me out, thinking the stuff I consider "normal" is now 30-40 years old and vintage to younger generations. As we get older, the years start flying by. My name is Cathy - and I'm addicted to old sewing machines and their attachments.) Hi Cathy, my name is Kathy and I am too. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:25 PM. |