Originally Posted by miriam
(Post 5600821)
I have a big one like that - looks like a bulldozer and an old Singer which is smaller. I'm thinking the bigger one went on an industrial machine and maybe stayed connected - then just use that machine for button holes only. I think it would be putting it on and off the machine rather than using it would tear up the machine. I'm betting you need the plate to cover the feed dogs too. Is it a regular shank?
The more I thought about the buttonholer...it was purchased in 1945 and by that time this 1911 machine was old news compared to the newer electric models - so I wonder if this was a purchase made special to fit the owner's "old machine". The smaller modern buttonholers of that time would have been available by that time wouldn't they? I have one dated 1947 by Singer for my featherweight. I bet they bought this big honker to fit this "old" machine in particular.
Originally Posted by J Miller
(Post 5601023)
The monster button holler is just a camera angle thing. I have two of the Singer versions and they are about the same size. Both bolt up and work just fine on any low shank machine.
Joe I will take a picture and post later on - the Husband is off today so we are in and out of the house running errands. :)
Originally Posted by Caroline S
(Post 5601148)
That is a "beasty buttonholer". $10 in 1945 was a lot of money. Is there a part number on it?
Originally Posted by miriam
(Post 5601399)
growl grumble grumble now I'm gonna havta dig 'em both out of some stash box or another and snap a few pics....
|
Sharon, hope your pet does well at the doctors.
Lots of pretty machines have found new homes. Enjoy. Charlee, glad you are feeling better and hope you are back to doing all the things you like to do real soon. Miss seeing you on here. |
4 Attachment(s)
I thought that a few pictures of these non-cam buttonholers might be fun and useful. I dug out a few representatives from my collection (hoard).
The BHer in the last pix is for an industrial class 31(high shank). It should fit the 31-15 and 31-20 machines. They are beasts, but work very well and don't need to be removed from the machine to change a cam size. The size adjustments are the wing nuts on the side. Cathy [ATTACH=CONFIG]371511[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]371512[/ATTACH][ATTACH=CONFIG]371513[/ATTACH] |
Originally Posted by Mizkaki
(Post 5601924)
I thought that a few pictures of these non-cam buttonholers might be fun and useful. I dug out a few representatives from my collection (hoard).
The BHer in the last pix is for an industrial class 31(high shank). It should fit the 31-15 and 31-20 machines. They are beasts, but work very well and don't need to be removed from the machine to change a cam size. The size adjustments are the wing nuts on the side. Cathy |
Originally Posted by Mizkaki
(Post 5601924)
I thought that a few pictures of these non-cam buttonholers might be fun and useful. I dug out a few representatives from my collection (hoard).
The BHer in the last pix is for an industrial class 31(high shank). It should fit the 31-15 and 31-20 machines. They are beasts, but work very well and don't need to be removed from the machine to change a cam size. The size adjustments are the wing nuts on the side. Cathy It could very well be that the buttonholer I have doesn't go with this machine at all. I found about half dozen rubber belts in one of the drawers too and this machine is set up as a treadle. |
3 Attachment(s)
Here's another angle of the buttonholer, next to the Singer cam version for my featherweight...also the print end of the box it came in and the instruction manual to compare for fun. :)
|
Chris,
YES!! They do breed in captivity. Watch out! Those pix were only a small sampling of my hoard, most of which I don't remember buying. So they must be breeding. I also have proof that the attachments breed in captivity. :D:D:D Cathy
Originally Posted by chris_quilts
(Post 5602130)
Cathy; So they breed in captivity???? :D:D That would surely explain my stash (hoard) of both buttonholers and boxes of attachments.
|
Originally Posted by Mizkaki
(Post 5602438)
Chris,
YES!! They do breed in captivity. Watch out! Those pix were only a small sampling of my hoard, most of which I don't remember buying. So they must be breeding. I also have proof that the attachments breed in captivity. :D:D:D Cathy Chris |
sigh...
if they ain't breeding how do they get in? We could start a buttonholer picture gallery... Maybe some time I'll pull some out and shoot pics... that is if I can find them all. They hide and lurk in the nooks and crannies of my shop. I keep putting them in one place but they must sneak out and breed. |
Originally Posted by Charlee
(Post 5600438)
Hi Everyone! I've been reminded that I'm a slacker and should get here and post! :D
I'm better...the meds are helping and I have more energy, still drag a bit, but really am much better! Gotta go back and read what everyone has been up to!! ~hugs all around~ Good to hear you're doing better. If you're wanting to go junkin you must be getting better... that's good. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:23 PM. |