it's harder to moderate this section than any other on the board. too many "creative interpretations" of the policy. one or two gray areas left. i'm doing my best, but i wonder if i've relied a bit to heavily on a strict interpretation of one thing, in particular. baby pictures.
birth announcements are supposed to be in the PDAs. soooooo .... i've deleted a recent flood of grandbaby galleries in the General ChitChat section. however, i was smacked on the back of the head a few minutes ago by my own brain.
if pictures of pets are ok, why not babies? i am in no way suggesting we start thinking of babies as pets, but don't we think of our pets as our babies, too?
i guess my questions are these:
1. would i be wrong to assume that the vast majority of you agree that pics of our human babies are of equally general interest and sure-fire smile generators as pics of our pets?
2. would i be correct in assuming you'd rather i left the poor kids alone, for cryin' out loud?
3. and will you please forgive me? i meant well, if that counts for anything. :?