Judy, I am honored that you have posted here for me. I really, really like the pattern as it is so I would hate to lose the star-within-a star blocks. I hadn't done enough of the math in reducing the blocks to realize that you had found the only "sweet spot" for the block sizes so that the cutting is using friendly numbers. As I said, I like the look of a more delicate block but I also really like the pattern here as it is and wouldn't want to change the look of the blocks.
Regarding you patterns, I think what you have done in your books is probably the most sensible approach as it gives you the room to cover the most patterns in an economical space. I think purchasers get more than their money's worth from your books!!
Because of my work background (an auditor under constant heavy time and budget pressure) I find myself always looking for the most efficient method that will give really good results so I do like to strip piece when possible and making 2 flying geese at a time (not sure the method but it gives you 2 geese after sewing small blocks to the top opposite corners of a larger block). I guess this is what you are refering to as short-cuts. I am sorry I was negative about your patterns without fully explaining my thinking.
On another note, I am really excited to make your Summer Lake Log Cabin quilt and can't get the colors and fabrics you used for yours in your book (page 56) out of my head. The colors look a bit like a batik line a year or two ago that was maybe called Watermelon but your selection is much richer. Just this past year I made my first log cabin and used pink and greens from Maywoods Wildrose collection. It turned out really nice. Thank you again.