this is for admin - re: showing copyrighted stuff
06-03-2009, 08:01 PM
#32
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Cookeville, TN
Posts: 144
Originally Posted by quiltncrazy
Originally Posted by k3n
PMSL is 'peed' myself laughing (think Blue's word for pee has some ss in it though!
A kiwi is what they call New Zealanders. It's a type of bird, also a fruit so take your pick which suits Blue best! LOL
K x
A kiwi is what they call New Zealanders. It's a type of bird, also a fruit so take your pick which suits Blue best! LOL
K x
This probably doesn't make much sense to you, huh?
I've been hearing Blue's voice that way so long, am convinced that "my idea", is the reality!
You sound kind of funny when you speak French, bc of your having lived in England, but you do the accent well. Hans still sounds Dutch.
No I haven't gone loopy, you know everybody hears voices, here on the farm! :wink:
06-03-2009, 11:37 PM
#34
Power Poster
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 10,686
Here's a amap but I don't know the scale http://www.australian1.com/maps/Maps...ealand_map.gif
I think NZ is a way away from Oz though - Blue? Where are you when we need you?
K x
I think NZ is a way away from Oz though - Blue? Where are you when we need you?
K x
06-03-2009, 11:38 PM
#35
Power Poster
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Somerset, England
Posts: 10,686
Originally Posted by kwhite
Interesting point. Do you get mental images of what people look like from what they say? Wouldn't it be great to go into a room and try to pick out who everyone is?
K x
06-04-2009, 06:22 AM
#36
Administrator
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 459
dunster summed it up pretty nicely. I'm not a lawyer, but that pretty much fits my understanding of copyright laws.
With pictures, the person who takes the picture owns the copyright for the picture. It doesn't even matter who made the quilt. More important is who took the picture, not what's displayed on it (aside from some specific cases).
So as long as you believe no sane judge (or a jury of peers) would agree that the primary purpose of that particular picture is to distribute the pattern (so that the others can trace it, etc.), I don't think there is going to be a problem.
In other words, if you take a picture of a printout of some pattern and distribute such picture, that would probably be a violation of the law. Since it would be obvious that that the picture's primary purpose is to distribute the pattern.
But if you take a picture of a quit and distribute the picture with the intent to show your work then no laws are broken.
With pictures, the person who takes the picture owns the copyright for the picture. It doesn't even matter who made the quilt. More important is who took the picture, not what's displayed on it (aside from some specific cases).
So as long as you believe no sane judge (or a jury of peers) would agree that the primary purpose of that particular picture is to distribute the pattern (so that the others can trace it, etc.), I don't think there is going to be a problem.
In other words, if you take a picture of a printout of some pattern and distribute such picture, that would probably be a violation of the law. Since it would be obvious that that the picture's primary purpose is to distribute the pattern.
But if you take a picture of a quit and distribute the picture with the intent to show your work then no laws are broken.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
MyWifeMadeME
General Chit-Chat (non-quilting talk)
53
06-20-2011 02:36 PM
