Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums > Main
Singer machines >

Singer machines

Singer machines

Old 03-11-2011, 08:05 PM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
nett2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: OH
Posts: 83
Default

Are there other old singers that sew as well as the 221 featherweight? Also what is the difference between a 221 & a 221-1?
I've been reading this forum for awhile and have learned a lot form ya'll.
I'll get around to introducing myself soon.
TIA
nett2 is offline  
Old 03-11-2011, 08:25 PM
  #2  
Senior Member
 
tweetee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 528
Default

Originally Posted by nett2
Are there other old singers that sew as well as the 221 featherweight? Also what is the difference between a 221 & a 221-1?
I've been reading this forum for awhile and have learned a lot form ya'll.
I'll get around to introducing myself soon.
TIA
Just my humble opinion, I have 6 old singers, and my favorite is the 99. I seem to go back to mine when I am peicing at home, but when I go to friends places to sew, I take my 221. I dont think there is any difference between the 221 and the 221-1, I think it jus tmight be a later model of the 221. But, if you do a google search on 221 sewing machines, you ar sure to find out if there are any differences.
tweetee is offline  
Old 03-11-2011, 08:27 PM
  #3  
Super Member
 
sharoney's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: South Texas
Posts: 1,968
Default

I have a 99 that I FMQ on, and I LOVE it!
sharoney is offline  
Old 03-11-2011, 08:29 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
irishrose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Cadillac, MI
Posts: 6,487
Default

The 301 is a straight (non zizzag) stitch, so you get the same very straight stitch that you get with with a FW. The aren't as cute as the FWs, but not much heavier and better priced. I don't think you'd be disappointed with any all metal machine. Go look at this thread and see how many very antique machines are still going strong. http://www.quiltingboard.com/t-43881-1.htm

My 1956 301A sews wonderfully. I also have a 128 from 1956, but I haven't cleaned her yet to see how she does. I'm a little apprehensive about the shuttle instead of a bobbin, but I'm sure it will just be a learning experience and will be fine.
irishrose is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 09:28 AM
  #5  
Super Member
 
thepolyparrot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Mars
Posts: 2,006
Default

Originally Posted by nett2
Are there other old singers that sew as well as the 221 featherweight?
Almost any vintage or antique sewing machine sews as well or better than the FW. :) Honestly, I do plan to add a FW to my collection someday, but I think they're very overrated in terms of ability.

I don't particularly like my 301 - I just never have taken to it the way I have to others, but it's a good strong machine and will handle a much larger range of sewing tasks than the FW.

My 15's are my jewels - piecing and quilting and garment construction. But, I also love my old 66 from 1905 - it will sew through anything. So will the 27 or 28 from the late 1800's or the 201's from the 1940's. All of them straight-stitch only machines.

I have a gaggle of slant-needle zig-zag Singers that are almost as powerful and hugely versatile, especially for garment construction.

So it's not just the FW's that a sewist would want to add to their "herd," although those are (arguably?) the CUTEST machines in existence. ;)

I would never choose this machine as my primary or only machine, though. (Not even if it was candy apple red with antique gold fire truck decals! ;) )
thepolyparrot is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 09:51 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
cabbagepatchkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 1,775
Default

I have several 301's that were my favorite machines until I recently found a 404 at my local thrift shop. I think I have a new favorite :mrgreen:
cabbagepatchkid is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 10:11 AM
  #7  
Senior Member
 
emmah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Groton, NY
Posts: 406
Default

The Singer 99 and the Singer Spartan are the same machine (the Spartan doesn't have the gold trim or the light) and they are very reasonably priced compared to a Featherweight. A bit heavier to carry around, but sew very well for straight stitch. And they are cute, also.
emmah is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 10:33 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
leaha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 2,411
Default

rigth now I have 3 singers, 2 FW 221's and one 503A, guesS I will have to try them out. I got the 221 to take to classes and guild meeting, bee's ect. but at home I use my Pfaff's
leaha is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 10:35 AM
  #9  
Super Member
 
jlm5419's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: My Sewing Room
Posts: 1,180
Default

My 1940 Singer 201 was my first "vintage" machine. It sews at least as well as my 221. My 301 makes wonderful straight stitches, as do my 99s. I haven't really used my 101 to know how well it sews.
jlm5419 is offline  
Old 03-13-2011, 10:53 AM
  #10  
Power Poster
 
dunster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lake Elsinore, CA
Posts: 14,044
Default

I think all the old Singers sewed extremely well. The featherweight, as others have pointed out, is primarily popular because it's small enough to tote around to classes, and it's cute.
dunster is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
miriam
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
154
03-12-2014 07:43 AM
EvelynAnita
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
4
06-07-2012 03:29 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.