Would you want to be a British "Royal"?
05-14-2018, 01:31 PM
#11
Super Member
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Vermont
Posts: 6,995
They are "royal" because somewhere back in their family tree, an ancestor beat down or killed all of his opponents, or got them to be on his side somehow. Not something to be proud of IMO.
Although there is a theory that the current royal family is not the correct "heirs to the throne", it is actually a guy in Australia. Apparently many centuries ago a king in France went to war and when he came back his wife was pregnant and the dates did not add up. The Australian guy is not interested in pressing his case, though, can't say I blame him. Still it would be interesting to see the DNA evidence.
Although there is a theory that the current royal family is not the correct "heirs to the throne", it is actually a guy in Australia. Apparently many centuries ago a king in France went to war and when he came back his wife was pregnant and the dates did not add up. The Australian guy is not interested in pressing his case, though, can't say I blame him. Still it would be interesting to see the DNA evidence.
05-14-2018, 06:49 PM
#14
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: central TX
Posts: 3,076
Pros and cons either way. It would be wonderful to actually help other people the way Princess Diana helped eradicate so many past war landmines, proponent for respecting others warts & all, and setting new standards for "royals". IMHO
05-14-2018, 09:12 PM
#15
Power Poster
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 26,082
Originally Posted by nativetexan
People always had to look up to someone to rule. someone strong. We still do it. Not sure where the word Royal come in but rulers had families and those continued on ruling. on and on. But no, i would not want to be. too many people to be responsible for and too many watching my every move. nope, not me.
Have any of you watched "The Crown"? It's a very good series that portrays the royal family pretty accurately, with Elizabeth as the focus. They heir to the throne is raised to rule and is groomed for it their entire life. It's a huge responsibility, holding up the position of the crown. By the time they are crowned, they are ready. And their lives are a whole lot more than "being waited on".
William has known he will one day be king, since he was a little boy. When Diana and Charles divorced, Charles insisted she lose her title too. That means that she had to curtsy to all the royal highnesses, including her own sons! William, at the time, told her, "Don't worry Mummy. I'll give you your title back when I am king."
05-15-2018, 05:24 AM
#20
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Walton Hills, OH
Posts: 828
Originally Posted by dunster
I can't believe everyone is saying no. I think it would be a grand adventure.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bearisgray
General Chit-Chat (non-quilting talk)
65
02-01-2024 09:04 AM
craftybear
General Chit-Chat (non-quilting talk)
60
05-01-2011 05:36 PM
