Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums > Main
Vintage love/modern feature lusting dilemna >

Vintage love/modern feature lusting dilemna

Vintage love/modern feature lusting dilemna

Old 01-14-2014, 07:38 PM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Posts: 459
Default Vintage love/modern feature lusting dilemna

I have been hit by the vintage bug last year and I got a nice Singer 15-91 in a cabinet. The harp size is quite roomy, and it is really fast! I'm working here on a twin size quilt, and I'm not struggling at all.

I also have a Bernina Artista 730 with the BSR, but the harp is a short 7.5, so I have found that the best combinaison is to "stabilize" my quilt with the 15-91 or use it for design made with a simple walking foot. Then I free motion with the Bernina all the area where I want a more complex or detailed design.
I also have a Featherweight (for piecing) and a old Bernina 831 (for general sewing).
My dilemna right now is to replace or not the Singer 15-91 by a modern mechanical straight sticher (Juki 20-10/Brother Q-1500/Pfaff Grand Quilter).

I must say I don't love my Singer 15-91 like I love my vintage Bernina. What I feel is more like the respect for an excellent tool, still performing flawlessly after more than 50 years. I certainly appreciate that. And each time I use it, I'm amazed by how well it sew without any fuss.

The only thing I miss when I'm using the Singer 15-91 are the "modern" feature that I'm so happy to have on the Bernina: thread cutter/ tying off/ needle up/down. I know, it's silly. But I make a lots of start and stop in my designs.

The Singer 15-91 is fast; faster than the Bernina for sure. But is it doing 1500s/m? If I compare with my serger, I don't think so. Maybe more 1000/1200s/m.

Anyway, I'm torn. Rationnaly, it seems stupid to replace a perfectly performing 50$ machine for one that will cost 500$. So why am I itching to do it?
Attached Thumbnails img_20140114_154025.jpg   img_20140114_154725.jpg  
profannie is offline  
Old 01-14-2014, 07:58 PM
  #2  
Power Poster
 
dunster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Lake Elsinore, CA
Posts: 14,621
Default

hmmm... the 15-91 will be performing just as well in another 50 years as it does today. Can you say the same for the more modern machines?
dunster is online now  
Old 01-14-2014, 08:09 PM
  #3  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Centralia, WA, USA
Posts: 4,890
Default

The best argument I have is your 50 year old machine will still perform just as well 50 years from now with nothing more than basic maintenance. I'm not sure we can say the same about modern machines. I'd keep it and get the modern one too if I really wanted one.
Rodney
Rodney is offline  
Old 01-14-2014, 08:10 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Centralia, WA, USA
Posts: 4,890
Default

Dunster beat me to it while I was still typing.
Rodney
Rodney is offline  
Old 01-14-2014, 08:12 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
stillclock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 764
Default

i can't really understand why you desire this.

but then...no one can truly understand the desire of another.

i do know that sometimes it is worthy to really think about want versus need, or in this case, why you are not satisfied with what you have. what you have is a selection of tools that perform beautifully, meet your needs and are paid for in full, both cash wise and in an environmental cost sense.

so....buying a new, mid to high level machine seems to me to be about something other than the tool. maybe you want to know what that is, maybe you don't. only you can say.

aileen
stillclock is offline  
Old 01-14-2014, 08:16 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
stillclock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 764
Default

i suspect though that you could easily talk yourself into a need position in regards to "modern" features such as needle up/down etc.

welcome to late capitalism!

aileen
stillclock is offline  
Old 01-14-2014, 08:26 PM
  #7  
Power Poster
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Western Wisconsin
Posts: 12,930
Default

I used to collect vintage machines, but then realized all I was doing was dusting them off because I preferred to actually sew on my Bernina 1230 (which has a foot-controlled needle up/down). Vintage was a phase I enjoyed for a long time. I sold most of my vintage machines to a collector who was just starting out and have never regretted doing so. Not everything is forever, so I say go with the machine that will give you the greatest enjoyment using!

Edit: I would advise keeping the old machine, though, until you are sure you prefer using the new one. Once you are sure, sell the old machine to someone who will value it!
Prism99 is offline  
Old 01-14-2014, 08:35 PM
  #8  
Super Member
 
Dolphyngyrl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Southern California
Posts: 6,239
Default

I am a modern girl myself, but I say do what feels right for you. vintage is not for everyone. If you are not feeling your singer why keep it
Dolphyngyrl is offline  
Old 01-15-2014, 03:32 AM
  #9  
Super Member
 
Mitch's mom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: TN
Posts: 1,443
Default

Originally Posted by Prism99 View Post
I used to collect vintage machines, but then realized all I was doing was dusting them off because I preferred to actually sew on my Bernina 1230 (which has a foot-controlled needle up/down). Vintage was a phase I enjoyed for a long time. I sold most of my vintage machines to a collector who was just starting out and have never regretted doing so. Not everything is forever, so I say go with the machine that will give you the greatest enjoyment using!

Edit: I would advise keeping the old machine, though, until you are sure you prefer using the new one. Once you are sure, sell the old machine to someone who will value it!
This is true for me also - except I don't have a Bernina . I did keep a 15-91 because it is my favorite vintage machine and a feather weight because it was a gift - otherwise - I like my bells and whistles. I really like my Brother PQ1500S. I know it may not be here in 10 or 15 years but I'll have got my use from it by then.
Mitch's mom is offline  
Old 01-15-2014, 03:49 AM
  #10  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 128
Default

You said:
"My dilemna right now is to replace or not the Singer 15-91 by a modern mechanical straight sticher (Juki 20-10/Brother Q-1500/Pfaff Grand Quilter). "

****************

I have the Juki TL98E which is a previous model of the 2010 and love it for piecing and FMQ. I have great speed control with it, love the needle up/down, thread trimmer, knee lift.

I use my computerized machine for other sewing, but the Juki is great for quilting.

Debbie

Last edited by Scrappy Gram; 01-15-2014 at 03:52 AM.
Scrappy Gram is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Grammie Sharon
Main
47
04-25-2014 06:11 AM
oldsewnsew
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
9
02-16-2014 12:17 AM
CheekyCognoscenti
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
18
04-29-2013 12:33 PM
MommaDorian
Pictures
12
04-23-2011 11:19 AM
Elisabrat
General Chit-Chat (non-quilting talk)
35
01-29-2010 09:03 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


FREE Quilting Newsletter