Info about Singer 201?

Thread Tools
 
Old 04-01-2014, 05:41 AM
  #1  
Senior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Greenville, Alabama
Posts: 544
Default Info about Singer 201?

At a recent quilt show I saw a Singer 201 that had been mounted on a frame to do FMQ. It was much less expensive than all those new machines. My husband tried it out and just took off sewing with it. I did not get a chance as the bobbin had to be refilled and we did not have time to stay. Now I cannot get it off my mind.
Anyone know much about that machine? I do know that it has a larger throat area than most antique machines.
Brenda
mama's place is offline  
Old 04-01-2014, 07:52 AM
  #2  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 9,319
Default

"The bobbin needed to be refilled" would be the biggest negative about using the machine on a frame. The bobbins are small and they're drop ins. Not only would you have to be dealing with small bobbins running out frequently, you'd also have to be shifting the machine to the side all the time because the quilt would cover up where you need to insert bobbins. This is why long arm machines have a horizontal bobbin assembly. I had a 301 on a frame for a while and found the room to quilt with when the quilt is rolled, is very, very small. The 301 is only slightly smaller than the throat of the 201.
Candace is offline  
Old 04-01-2014, 09:31 AM
  #3  
Super Member
 
Macybaby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 8,138
Default

I personally much prefer using a Singer 15 for FMQ than the Singer 201.

I wouldn't say it has a larger throat area then most antique/vintage machines - I've got a lot of non-singers that have much more room.

The 201 is my husband's favorite machine, so maybe it's also a guy thing! He liked it so much he had to get his own instead of using mine.
Macybaby is offline  
Old 04-01-2014, 02:13 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
manicmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 1,850
Default

Originally Posted by mama's place View Post
Anyone know much about that machine? I do know that it has a larger throat area than most antique machines.
Brenda
Loads of people would consider it the best domestic machine ever made. Stitches are perfection.
As someone who makes clothing, the 201 is magnificent. Quilters have already told you they aren't good for quilting but since sewing through five layers of 1970s jeans with a 201, I always have at least one in the house. They're very cheap, very plentiful and extremely reliable and will sew everything from silk to (at least) five layers of denim.
If you Google it, you'll only find others like me extolling its virtues.
I can understand Candace's comments, which are totally valid. If you want an old machine for quilting, a 15 is usually the preferred option. But if you also sew clothing, you should get a 201 as well.
manicmike is offline  
Old 04-02-2014, 06:07 AM
  #5  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kansas City, Missouri
Posts: 1,040
Default

Originally Posted by mama's place View Post
At a recent quilt show I saw a Singer 201 that had been mounted on a frame to do FMQ. It was much less expensive than all those new machines. My husband tried it out and just took off sewing with it. I did not get a chance as the bobbin had to be refilled and we did not have time to stay. Now I cannot get it off my mind.
Anyone know much about that machine? I do know that it has a larger throat area than most antique machines.
Brenda
I have 3 Singer 201 and in my opinion it is the best machine Singer ever made. I do not fmq on it because of the horizontal bobbin position. I put binding on my quilts with the 201 because they have no trouble sewing thru 7 layers of material. I also have 3 singer 15-91 which I dearly love also and these I use for FMQ work because of the vertical bobbin.
Blackberry is offline  
Old 04-02-2014, 06:31 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 9,319
Default

Originally Posted by Candace View Post
"The bobbin needed to be refilled" would be the biggest negative about using the machine on a frame. The bobbins are small and they're drop ins. Not only would you have to be dealing with small bobbins running out frequently, you'd also have to be shifting the machine to the side all the time because the quilt would cover up where you need to insert bobbins. This is why long arm machines have a horizontal bobbin assembly. I had a 301 on a frame for a while and found the room to quilt with when the quilt is rolled, is very, very small. The 301 is only slightly smaller than the throat of the 201.
Oops I meant to write that's why longarms have vertical bobbin assemblies..
Candace is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Kas
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
17
10-12-2021 10:07 AM
flawhoopi
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
6
12-22-2013 11:29 PM
Carol34446
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
1
09-16-2013 10:53 AM
Teacup
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
17
05-26-2012 05:11 PM
J Miller
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
26
03-24-2012 01:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



FREE Quilting Newsletter