Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums > Main > For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
Singer 27 Treadle to Electric Conversion >

Singer 27 Treadle to Electric Conversion

Singer 27 Treadle to Electric Conversion

Old 01-28-2016, 08:58 AM
  #1  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 6
Default Singer 27 Treadle to Electric Conversion

I have a Singer 27 Treadle and was wondering if anyone has converted to electric. I know most of you are probably not in favor of a conversion. But, I really want a machine with a larger throat for quilting. I haven't cleaned her up yet but all the parts move freely. Her looks are worn but her mechanics seem good and she does have a factory motor mount. Any thoughts on a conversion? Thank you.
rebeccapie is offline  
Old 01-28-2016, 12:00 PM
  #2  
Power Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 15,510
Default

I have one somebody converted. I don't know why but I don't like it. I do like the ones I have that are treadle or HC. I think they just have to move so far... I D K.
miriam is offline  
Old 01-28-2016, 03:47 PM
  #3  
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: North East Lower peninsula of Michigan
Posts: 6,228
Default

I have my grandma's redeye that was converted from treadle to electric I sewed on it as a child when learning to treadle was a challenge. I am sorry to see it be electric and hope someday to be able to convert it back. But I am so glad it was gifted to me!
__________________
Up North is offline  
Old 01-28-2016, 06:54 PM
  #4  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Washington
Posts: 4,001
Default

It just kind of seems like if they were made treadle or hand crank they should stay that way, just a feeling I have. Not to say I wouldn't change one if I wanted to, just my feeling is it is like cheating them or something.lol There are so many electric's available today, I just don't see why I would change an oldie to electric if it wasn't done already. Other than my feeling go with what you want to do, it is your machine and you know what your needs are.
sewbeadit is offline  
Old 01-29-2016, 06:25 AM
  #5  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: My Sewing Room
Posts: 1,180
Default

If the treadling irons are in poor shape, I say go for it. Otherwise, I like the idea of having a machine that doesn't require electricity.
jlm5419 is offline  
Old 01-29-2016, 08:35 AM
  #6  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,963
Default

Mounting a motor and light on the 27 will not ruin it, and you can keep the treadle part. The treadle part has it's advantages, you can get a fantastic feeling for the rythm of stitching and movment of the material on a treadle. Have you had the chance to use your 27 as it is? All my machines are electrical, my 201 probably was converted from treadle to electrical early on in it's life. I wish they left the treadle parts on the cabinet, even though they are a very heavy.

On the other hand it might be just as easy to get a full size machine like the 27, 127 (or other full size model) already with an electrical setup. The smaller solid hand wheel might be an advantage with an electrical setup compared to the spoked hand wheel. I have a spoked hand wheel on my electrical 201 and I am thinking of getting another one which was originally set up with motor and light from the start. Some of the small cabinets for electrical machines are very nice too.
Mickey2 is offline  
Old 01-30-2016, 06:11 AM
  #7  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tippy-top of a ridge in WV
Posts: 6,355
Default

If you had as many power failures as we do here, you would definitely keep it as is for treadling.
Yooper32 is offline  
Old 01-30-2016, 10:27 AM
  #8  
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 82
Default

I'll regard your question as a totally practical one. Like Mickey said, putting a motor on is not burning any bridges, it's a reversible action. Unscrewing the motor and slipping the belt back on takes 5 minutes. Things get a little more complicated if you want the light.

Mickey also mentioned the heavier flywheel as a small issue, but Singer supplied motorized units for a long time before the smaller flywheel (hand wheel, then) was developed. The only difference is abrupt starts and stops being a little less abrupt with more inertia. Another issue is you may not be able to fold the head fully into the table with the motor on.

I collected 5 Husqvarnas in different condition, and assembled these three from the lot. I needed them for a charity project. The one to the right was hand cranked, motorized with a Singer motor, you can see the 3 prong connector. The one to the left is fitted with the smaller hand wheel, easy to see what Mickey is talking about.
I guess the point is, it's not hard.
But unless you have a motor lying about, it's likely to cost as much as a good condition motorized machine.
Attached Thumbnails image.jpeg  

Last edited by steihy; 01-30-2016 at 10:37 AM.
steihy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
yobrosew
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
7
04-07-2018 02:04 PM
Fixedgearhead
Pictures
72
03-27-2018 05:19 PM
yobrosew
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
12
08-29-2014 03:17 PM
yobrosew
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
22
08-20-2014 05:23 PM
vintagemotif
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
2
06-17-2011 10:07 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


FREE Quilting Newsletter


SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.