Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums > Main
Difference between dual feed and walking foot? >

Difference between dual feed and walking foot?

Difference between dual feed and walking foot?

Thread Tools
 
Old 07-30-2012, 07:27 AM
  #21  
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Hampshire, Illinois
Posts: 212
Default

i agree, btw nicely said
ellifour is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 07:49 AM
  #22  
Super Member
 
TexasGurl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GREAT STATE OF TEXAS
Posts: 1,415
Default

You don't need a walking foot if your machine has dual feed ... A "walking foot" is a separate attachment, made for the older machines that DON'T have the built-in dual feed feature.

** I just read back, didn't realize that a Bernina would need BOTH ?? I have the Janome 6600 and a Pfaff with IDT, the built-in dual feed for both handles everything, from piecing to mq to bindings.
For the money spent, a new Bernina should NOT need another expensive and clunky walking foot !! makes no sense, except for Bernina sales $$ of course !!

Last edited by TexasGurl; 07-30-2012 at 07:56 AM.
TexasGurl is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 07:54 AM
  #23  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 9,319
Default

Originally Posted by TexasGurl View Post
You don't need a walking foot if your machine has dual feed ... the suggestion was mistaken.
A "walking foot" is a separate attachment, made for the older machines that DON'T have the built-in dual feed feature.

You are mistaken and should read the whole thread. The OP is asking about a Bernina 830.
Candace is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 08:04 AM
  #24  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Timmins, Ont. Canada
Posts: 4,683
Default

To add to my previous post concerning a walking foot vs the Bernina dual feed foot. This dual feed foot works very well but I find that the thicker the combined fabrics are, the walking foot handles it more efficiently. Maybe it's my batting or the type of fabrics I was working with but on 2 occasions the dual feed foot was not efficient on those 2 quilts & I was very glad to have purchased the walking foot with my Bernina 820. IMHO the walking foot was worth the money even at its inflated price.
callen is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 08:06 AM
  #25  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 9,319
Default

Originally Posted by callen View Post
To add to my previous post concerning a walking foot vs the Bernina dual feed foot. This dual feed foot works very well but I find that the thicker the combined fabrics are, the walking foot handles it more efficiently. Maybe it's my batting or the type of fabrics I was working with but on 2 occasions the dual feed foot was not efficient on those 2 quilts & I was very glad to have purchased the walking foot with my Bernina 820. IMHO the walking foot was worth the money even at its inflated price.
I agree. And I would also add, that if one has spent the money it costs to buy the 830 an extra $150 for the best tool is sort of a no brainer:> And then add on the Blind stitch attachment of around $35...
Candace is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 08:37 AM
  #26  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Outer Space
Posts: 9,319
Default

OOPS, I meant Stitch in the Ditch attachment.
Candace is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 11:18 AM
  #27  
Super Member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Round Rock,Texas
Posts: 6,135
Default

The walking foot is a foot that makes the top layer move along at the same rate as the bottom layer. IDT/dual feed does the same thing, but its built into the machine. I love my Pfaff with IDT, I quilt with it because its easier to see where I'm sewing, the walking foot for my other machines works well, but its harder to see where I'm going. I also like the IDT on my Pfaff for piecing quilt blocks, especially flannels; my blocks usually come out to the correct size.

Last edited by purplefiend; 07-30-2012 at 11:21 AM.
purplefiend is offline  
Old 07-30-2012, 09:11 PM
  #28  
Super Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Florida - formerly Montana
Posts: 3,504
Default

Thanks to all of you for the information. I am going to make a trip to my trusted Bernina dealer. He is very knowledgeable, and fair. He. Is from Switzerland and is a master technician for the Berninas. He worked for Bernina in Switzerland and trained the trainers. Again, thanks for your input.
QandE2010 is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 03:59 AM
  #29  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: East Tennessee
Posts: 1,102
Default

I read the other day that the ITD moves with the feed dogs and the walking foot moves with the needle. I don't know if that makes ANY difference at all. Just something that caught my eye and stayed in my memory bank for some reason.
AshleyR is offline  
Old 07-31-2012, 06:24 AM
  #30  
Super Member
 
TexasGurl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GREAT STATE OF TEXAS
Posts: 1,415
Default

Originally Posted by Candace View Post
You are mistaken and should read the whole thread. The OP is asking about a Bernina 830.
My my, someone sure got up on the wrong side of the bed !!!

I didn't realize that this particular Bernina model required TWO separate dual-feed /walking ft attachments ?? Why ?? Sounds like another $$ sale for Bernina.
Why not provide a built-in dual feed that can do it ALL ... like Pfaff and Janome does ??

Last edited by TexasGurl; 07-31-2012 at 06:28 AM.
TexasGurl is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
okie2tx
Main
18
04-10-2016 12:00 PM
angelaz
Main
9
04-11-2014 05:34 AM
twoxover
Main
4
04-19-2013 07:06 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



FREE Quilting Newsletter