Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums > Main
The new Featherweight machine,,,,,,,,, >

The new Featherweight machine,,,,,,,,,

The new Featherweight machine,,,,,,,,,

Thread Tools
 
Old 10-11-2011, 05:32 AM
  #31  
Junior Member
 
ree-nee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sweet Home, Alabama
Posts: 261
Default

If I was going to spend money for a featherweight it would definately not be this machine.
ree-nee is offline  
Old 10-11-2011, 05:35 AM
  #32  
Member
 
Julieintheburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Posts: 35
Default

I dont want to be negative or rain on anyones parade! If you love the new Featherweight, I think you should get it. I have an old one and love to use it occasionally for piecing, but end up missing so many features my other maching has such as the needle down. That being said, I guess I can see the appeal of the new ones. It's like having the best of both worlds. But when I saw what they look like, it just seemed sort of....wrong.
Julieintheburg is offline  
Old 10-11-2011, 05:46 AM
  #33  
Senior Member
 
pippi65's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Central, Illinois
Posts: 399
Default

Sorry....but that's just ugly!! Not to mention the price!! What are they thinking? I'll stick to my old ones thank you!! Thanks for showing us.
pippi65 is offline  
Old 10-11-2011, 05:51 AM
  #34  
Super Member
 
MaryAnnMc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: in front of this dang computer instead of my Bernina!(Naples, Florida)
Posts: 1,653
Default

Originally Posted by clsurz
I have the Featherweight computerized machine and love it. It also has several stitches that can be used with it. HSN was selling it for $499 or some such amount and I bought it at JoAnn's online few months ago for $230 and I wouldn't trade it in for anything. This little machine is a workhorse and amazingly the only thing plastic on it is the case. Everything else is metal.
That's good to know! I would have assumed it's plastic inside, too. Hmmmm... and it wouldn't stink like the old FWs.
MaryAnnMc is offline  
Old 10-11-2011, 06:01 AM
  #35  
Super Member
 
desertrose's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Northern New Hampshire
Posts: 1,936
Default

Originally Posted by jaciqltznok
Originally Posted by Charlee
$649.00 with a trade in, $499.00
wow...for all that plastic...sigh...
would rather have a 301 long bed I think!
Did you notice how narrow the throat is on this machine! And I complain about my Brother with a 5" throat. Compared to this Singer's I could land planes on mine. LOL
desertrose is offline  
Old 10-11-2011, 06:27 AM
  #36  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: IN
Posts: 1,153
Default

I guess I'm in the minority here. I like the way it looks. Kind of "modern-retro". I would consider buying it with a few qualifiers. Must be metal (body and gears), must be made in USA, and I would have to take a test drive. Singer hasn't had a good track record lately so I would definitely be looking for the "qualifiers". Just because their quality hasn't been good for a while, doesn't mean that they haven't been listening to the negative feedback and trying to make changes. If you got one and it didn't perform, it could always go back.
Val in IN is offline  
Old 10-11-2011, 06:45 AM
  #37  
Super Member
 
wvdek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: A million dollar view!
Posts: 8,830
Default

I like the decals being used again. The color makes me think my blueberry jam got mixed up with something it shouldn't have.
This machine does not appeal to me even if I had the bucks to throw down for it.
wvdek is offline  
Old 10-11-2011, 06:48 AM
  #38  
Super Member
 
TexasGurl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: GREAT STATE OF TEXAS
Posts: 1,415
Default

WHAT were they thinking ? IMHO it's kind of ugly, no matter what price point ! Tacky Blue plastic is Retro ? No metal and no throat space ?
Can't improve on the Original FW :roll:
TexasGurl is offline  
Old 10-11-2011, 07:06 AM
  #39  
Super Member
 
GramaLaura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Georgetown TX
Posts: 4,375
Default

AWESOME!!!! I WOULD LOVE ONE :-D
GramaLaura is offline  
Old 10-11-2011, 07:17 AM
  #40  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Port Ludlow, WA
Posts: 1,379
Default

A Singer today is NOT a singer of yesteryear no matter how they make it.
Happy Linda is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
mountainwoman
Main
34
08-22-2019 04:18 PM
craftybear
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
1159
10-01-2016 11:14 AM
quiltgal
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
21
12-04-2011 04:13 PM
joanking64
Introduce Yourself
28
09-11-2011 12:36 PM
Cheshirecatquilter
Main
3
03-07-2011 08:22 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



FREE Quilting Newsletter