Originally Posted by auntpiggylpn
(Post 6511471)
Here you go!!! http://video.pbs.org/video/2365151651/
|
Originally Posted by Weezy Rider
(Post 6511851)
Why was the bottom row split? As it hung, it looked like 2 of the squares on the bottom row were not attached to the row above.
I don't think there would be much difference if a Quilt Appraiser valued it. I think this type of quilt really falls more into the Folk Art category. |
That must have been an exciting day. Love that program - even watch the program from England when I can.
Congratulations. |
It was a really beautiful quilt and I was wondering the same thing as Weezy Rider, I only caught part of it while cleaning up the kitchen! I sure love it when I see things like quilts on Antiques Roadshow. Did anyone catch the watercolor at the end, insurance value $250,000!!!
|
I noticed several squares that were not fully attached. Could the squares have been individual finished squares and then butt together and sewn?
|
Thanks for posting the link! The quilt was obviously not stored in a wooden chest or it would have stains from that. It was well cared for.
|
Originally Posted by Weezy Rider
(Post 6511851)
Why was the bottom row split? As it hung, it looked like 2 of the squares on the bottom row were not attached to the row above.
|
Weezy, it was disintegrating. All of the wool used in it was disintegrating as well-probably eaten by moths.
|
All of the red looked to be in very good shape, it was the blue that had deteriorated. I shudder to think if anyone ever tried to wash that quilt, with all that red from that many years ago...you would have a pink quilt. I too wondered about those two bottom blocks and had it in my head that it was constructed that way, but that doesn't make much sense either. ???
|
They said it was blue wool that had deteriorated and that the cotton was all in good condition. I too noticed the squares at the bottom, but they were never mentioned on the show.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:32 PM. |