Why does the cotton thread myth continue?
#61
Super Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Jozefow, Poland
Posts: 4,474
I agree with the comments about cotton being easy to work with and able to take heat. I am surprised that no one mentioned that polyester can cut through cotton threads in a sawing effect...over time. All of my quilts are not intended as heirlooms so I use what I feel is best suited for my project.
--the OP was saying that this is a "myth".
And we are discussing it.
As for me, I use what I have.
#62
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 836
[QUOTE=quilterpurpledog;6537424] Having a textiles background I would say that the information you get from Superior Threads (Dr. Bob) is very well done and informative. /QUOTE]
I wonder how many people realize that he has an MBA, not a doctorate.
Hugs,
charlotte
I wonder how many people realize that he has an MBA, not a doctorate.
Hugs,
charlotte
#63
Heck, water is used to cut steel...
I don't really think the context of his "Dr. Bob" title is intended to be literal. Nor is "Mother Superior" likely to be an indication that Superior threads is run by a nun....
#64
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 836

Hugs,
Charlotte
#65
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 609
Given enough time anything can be picked apart to show its bad points. This is the whole idea behind selling a product. This is how its "proved" one thing is better than the other in the consumers eye. With a few adjustments poly thread may perform the same as cotton thread in the short term of a few dozen years. The manufacturers aren't really worried about the long haul unless its a company who's been around for hundreds of years and based their longevity around the product.
Poly is cheaper to make so more profit. Poly is renewable since it can be made from recycled "trash", Poly can be made into new and exciting types of threads. The stuff melts under high temps. Will it stand the test of time? Who Knows.
Cotton is an old product and more expensive since it must be grown and treated to be useable. Cotton can be changed in its coloring and is user friendly. Cotton doesn't melt and has been found in the pyramids. Its stood the test of time.
Poly is cheaper to make so more profit. Poly is renewable since it can be made from recycled "trash", Poly can be made into new and exciting types of threads. The stuff melts under high temps. Will it stand the test of time? Who Knows.
Cotton is an old product and more expensive since it must be grown and treated to be useable. Cotton can be changed in its coloring and is user friendly. Cotton doesn't melt and has been found in the pyramids. Its stood the test of time.
#66
Sort of like Dr. Phil doesn't have a doctorate either?Possibly, but it's also less expensive on the average even at the consumer level. I paid $3.75 for a mini spool of Glide (1000m I think. It's downstairs and I'm feeling lazy), and on average I pay about $8 for a 1300m spool of Aurifil cotton. No, not apples to apples, but the only Aurifil Poly I've bought was on an awesome sale from Tristan, I don't even know the retail on it.
Cotton doesn't melt and has been found in the pyramids. Its stood the test of time.
I'm not saying poly is superior, I'm saying there's a right tool for each job.
Most of the quilts I make are going to be hard used and short lived (charity quilts, stepped on, stretched, used for play forts, used as superman capes, camping, etc), and I think the poly will stand up better so that's what I use. The fact that Lucey likes it and is very friendly to use with poly is a bonus.
For my Aphrodite quilt which may end up a show quilt and likely seldom used or often hung, it will likely be cotton thread for the surface design.
At the end of the day, we have to make our decisions based on the information we have available to us at the moment. If it turns out to be wrong down the road, so be it. We made the best choice with what we we knew.
</snip>
#67
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 836
[QUOTE=ArchaicArcane;6540377]Fair comment
Sort of like Dr. Phil doesn't have a doctorate either?
You got me curious on that one. On his website, it says he does. Is that fake? I haven't been paying attention. Perhaps you're thinking of Dr. Laura, who indeed had a doctorate but not in psychology. There was a flap about that some years ago.
Charlotte
Sort of like Dr. Phil doesn't have a doctorate either?You got me curious on that one. On his website, it says he does. Is that fake? I haven't been paying attention. Perhaps you're thinking of Dr. Laura, who indeed had a doctorate but not in psychology. There was a flap about that some years ago.
Charlotte
#68
I seem to remember a similar flap about Dr Phil a bunch of years ago too. Perhaps he's rectified it, maybe it was untrue at the time, I don't know.
#69
the rift may be that some think he has a doctorate in psychiatry, which he doesn't
i found the wiki bio quite interesting
Last edited by QuiltnNan; 01-29-2014 at 05:18 PM. Reason: spelling
#70
according to wikipedia, he does have a doctorate in psychology. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phil_McGraw
the rift may be that some think he has a doctorate in psychiatry, which he doesn't
i found the wiki bio quite interesting
the rift may be that some think he has a doctorate in psychiatry, which he doesn't
i found the wiki bio quite interesting
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post


