Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums > Main > For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
Comparing Kenmore 3/4 size, Featherweight or 301? >

Comparing Kenmore 3/4 size, Featherweight or 301?

Comparing Kenmore 3/4 size, Featherweight or 301?

Old 08-24-2014, 03:22 PM
  #1  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 172
Default Comparing Kenmore 3/4 size, Featherweight or 301?

Hi all,
I have a Featherweight that I take to my quilting group but am wondering whether I "need" something tougher, maybe one of the portable Kenmores like a 1040, or a Singer 301. I like my Featherweight but you know how this addiction is... I always wonder if i need more machines. Do any of you have suggestions about whether to add to my portable collection? I have three other Kenmores that stay in cabinets, so, no shortage of options at home.
Ila in Denver
iadhikari is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 03:53 PM
  #2  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Centralia, WA, USA
Posts: 4,890
Default

You're not likely to get too many people telling you not to get more machines around here.
You have to make up your own mind. Ask yourself what your likes and dislikes are for your featherweight and what features you might want that it doesn't have or that another machine might do better. A 301 isn't going to weigh much more and shares the same bobbins as your featherweight. I think it's a slant shank machine so feet won't interchange though. I don't recall seeing too many people complaining that their featherweights are fragile. They're tiny but they seem to hold up well. I'm not familiar enough with the Kenmores to know if you would like one better or not.
That or just go out and buy at least one of each so you can try them all.
Rodney
Rodney is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 04:11 PM
  #3  
Junior Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 172
Default

No, my Featherweight is not fragile. It's a little tank. I love it -- I just worry about larger pieces of quilt tops feeding through with those tiny little feed dogs. Once my blocks are pieced on the FW, I do the rest of the assembly on a Kenmore in a cabinet. So, I think your comment has made me realize that what I want is a portable machine that can handle larger chunks of piecework, if that makes sense. Depending on what stage of quilt assembly I'm at, I might want something heavier, but not too heavy to drag to my car... a 301, then... maybe.
iadhikari is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 04:47 PM
  #4  
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Victorian Sweatshop Forum
Posts: 4,097
Default

Lots of people love those little 3/4 size Kenmores. They start at the 1030 and go up for 4 or 5 models, each adding a new feature or two.

Cari
Cari-in-Oly is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 05:02 PM
  #5  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 384
Default

I think there's a kenmore 1020 as well but never seen one. I have few, 301, and a 3/4 kenmore. I haven't sewn on any exclusively but one bee a lot of the quilters are using fw, another sewin a quilter has a painted 301..never seen the kenmore being used..seems like newer machines after tha tut all it takes is one person to show up with something cool...my aunt uses her fw for binding seems like and she hasn't had a problem. Don't think I'd try quilting on mine since I do bigger quilts but might try a baby quilt sometime. All I do at quilt thingies us piece and sometimes a rag quilt
quilt938 is offline  
Old 08-24-2014, 05:03 PM
  #6  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 384
Default

The little kenmore is still small would prob have more room with the 301
quilt938 is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 06:27 AM
  #7  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 8,092
Default

A good lightweight 3/4 size machine is a Japanese clone of the Singer 99K-10. They are made from aluminum and are the same as the 99s but don't weigh any more than the FWs. They have more room under the arch, stronger motors and share the same feet and accessories. The only supply difference is they use Class 66 bobbins and are top loading. Many folks don't like the top loading part. Me ... I prefer it.

These machines can be seen badged as Bantams or just named as my SEWMOR 303 is:
[ATTACH=CONFIG]488984[/ATTACH]
Notice the feather through the logo.

These are what I'd go for if I wanted a 3/4 sized carry around machine. Oh ... right, I already have one

Joe
Attached Thumbnails img_5138.jpg  
J Miller is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 10:17 AM
  #8  
Super Member
 
oldtnquiltinglady's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Lafayette, TN
Posts: 1,204
Default

Joe, you're right about the Spartan. I have one that is beautiful and light and sews like a dream. I use it when I am holding classes; let the ladies have their choice, FW, 301, Spartan, 99k, and new Janome (if I take on that many students at one sitting.). My room gets crowded quickly.

And, yes, I do see the feather. But I had to go back and really look.
oldtnquiltinglady is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 11:05 AM
  #9  
Power Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 15,510
Default

The Kenmore does more stitches.... I love the little 185s 99s and Spartan machines, too. I have a little Domestic machine that only weighs about 10 or 11 lbs - it is a neat little machine - it runs backwards. I have a 3/4 Montgomery Ward that does zz, too. Why be so mainstream - there are lots of little machines out there. Have fun and enjoy what comes your way. FW has the big advantage of status.

Last edited by miriam; 08-25-2014 at 11:09 AM.
miriam is offline  
Old 08-25-2014, 11:42 AM
  #10  
Power Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 15,510
Default

Here is a link to a very ancient post - it is a fun read:
http://www.quiltingboard.com/vintage...e-t185449.html
miriam is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
PumpkinSundae
Main
3
04-08-2013 05:43 AM
judyjo
Main
12
11-05-2010 07:21 PM
stevendebbie25
Main
0
10-24-2010 02:35 AM
sewcrazygirl
Main
1
02-27-2010 07:04 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off


FREE Quilting Newsletter


SEO by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.