Which one to keep?

Thread Tools
 
Old 06-26-2016, 02:48 AM
  #21  
Power Poster
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 15,507
Default

While my go to machine is a 403 with all kinds of attachments, I'd say you can't go wrong with that era Kenmore. I have had a couple I got rid of and regretted. The Singer is worth a bit more money. Either one should clean up nice. Either one should handle most fabrics. Parts might be more readily available for the Singer. New wiring can be found for either machine.
miriam is offline  
Old 07-02-2016, 01:34 PM
  #22  
Member
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Ottawa, Ontario
Posts: 40
Default

You know, I'm thinking maybe my hairdresser should go on Kijiji and find her own machine! Now that I started comparing both, I don't want to part with either! I do, however, thinking the Singer has a more stylish look to it. I only bought the Kenmore to do zigzag sewing, but now I realize I got a much better machine than I'd realized.
Fledrmaus is offline  
Old 07-02-2016, 02:34 PM
  #23  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Blue Ridge Mountians
Posts: 7,076
Default

i'd keep the kenmore.
Jane Quilter is offline  
Old 07-06-2016, 08:39 PM
  #24  
Super Member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,585
Default

I have a Singer 403A, and I've used it to assemble a lot of quilt blocks. Piecing the blocks, I used my FW, but the blocks were 14.75 inches square, so it got to be pretty heavy for the FW. Nothing wrong with the machine, but the 403-A handled it much better. You may be better off keeping both machines, but if I had to make a choice, I'd keep the Singer!
Jeanette

Last edited by Jeanette Frantz; 07-06-2016 at 08:40 PM. Reason: correction
Jeanette Frantz is offline  
Old 07-06-2016, 10:19 PM
  #25  
Power Poster
 
Annaquilts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 11,903
Default

Originally Posted by sewbizgirl View Post
No Comparison between the Singer 403 and the Kenmore! Definitely keep the Singer. Resale value is ten times the Kenmore.
Yes definitely this!
Annaquilts is offline  
Old 07-07-2016, 02:42 AM
  #26  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,963
Default

For a Kenmore it's hard to to compete with a Singer. If it's well built it should be given a fair chance, which means cleaning, lubrication and actually using it for a while. If the grease looks old it should be replaced anyway, and from what I have observed most of grease is just squeezed out to the sides on the first turns after application, and never reaches the gear again; so I think a little smear more frequent will work better. This might depend on gear setup and grease though.

I searched up a picture of the Kenmore model, and it looks like some of the cams for it are double layered. It means back stitching and stretchy stitches. The cam function is probably of a fancier build than on the Singer 403 :- )

Last edited by Mickey2; 07-07-2016 at 02:45 AM.
Mickey2 is offline  
Old 07-07-2016, 04:07 AM
  #27  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Heart of Colorado's majestic mountains!
Posts: 6,026
Default

I'd keep the Singer-because that is precisely what I did. I have a 401 in a desk cabinet that I bought in 1959. I could not part with it. And, I still sew with it from time to time.
quilterpurpledog is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Ranchwife
Pictures
74
01-20-2016 10:55 AM
Sunflowerzz
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
23
10-21-2013 06:09 PM
LouBert
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
10
11-21-2011 03:01 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



FREE Quilting Newsletter