Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums >
  • General Chit-Chat (non-quilting talk)
  • new unwashed jeans and overalls >
  • new unwashed jeans and overalls

  • new unwashed jeans and overalls

    Thread Tools
     
    Old 06-11-2015, 06:59 AM
      #21  
    Power Poster
     
    Join Date: Mar 2013
    Location: Corpus Christi, Tx.
    Posts: 16,105
    Default

    Same here also. Stupid is when they're worn past the behind. As long as my clothes are clean, Idon't worry. And any top will go with jeans or capris. Was asked one time if my clothes match. I tell people to look out the window and see if mother nature's colors match. Nuff said!!
    Originally Posted by quiltin-nannie
    No jeans (or even dress pants) when I went to school! (I'm older than dirt) I think I was almost 30 before I had my first pair of jeans. Now it seems that's all I wear! Gotta love retirement! I'm wondering how old you have to be before you start looking stupid in jeans? I quit wearing shorts (long ones too, to the knees) a few years ago. I moved to capri pants.
    tessagin is offline  
    Old 06-11-2015, 07:23 AM
      #22  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Mar 2012
    Location: Texas, USA
    Posts: 5,896
    Default

    Originally Posted by quiltingcandy
    We could not wear "pants" to school until 1970. And even then we weren't allowed to wear jeans until 1972. My first pair of Levi's I bought at a fancy store called Fredericks & Nelson were what we called at the time - button up the front, now they call them 501's. They cost $5.00 and my mom thought that was terrible for jeans. I don't think my older sisters ever wore Levi's since they were out of school before it became fashionable to wear them.
    I graduated from high school, in '71. My jeans embroidery days were during college, between classes.
    Neesie is offline  
    Old 06-11-2015, 09:01 AM
      #23  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: May 2010
    Location: Round Rock,Texas
    Posts: 6,135
    Default

    When I was a teenager, I only wore Levi's 501 jeans; the ones with the button fly rather than a zipper. I bought them 2 sizes too big to allow for shrinkage. I miss my 501s. Pre-ripped jeans that you buy in the store are just stupid. I graduated high school in 1975.
    purplefiend is offline  
    Old 06-11-2015, 09:39 AM
      #24  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2013
    Posts: 2,657
    Default

    Remember when the girls would buy their Levi's, get them really wet and wear them til they dried so that when they shrunk, they were form fitting?
    Misty's Mom is offline  
    Old 06-11-2015, 10:53 AM
      #25  
    Junior Member
     
    Join Date: May 2011
    Location: sonoma county CA
    Posts: 134
    Default

    In the late 60's I worked for the telephone company as an operator. It was when pant suits were just starting to be available and the dress code was reluctantly modified to make them wearable to work. But the rules about what constituted a "pants suit" were very well defined. It needed to be the same fabric top and bottom, same color etc. One day a co-worker wore a very nice pair of burgundy wool pants and a matching wool sweater. She was sent home to change after much debate about woven wool vs. knit wool etc. The powers that be and the union rep reached an agreement that even though the rules did not describe it that way a "pants suit" basically meant a mens' wear style suit worn by a girl.

    My co-worker went home and came back the next day wearing .... jeans, a white button down shirt, and a jeans jacket. It checked off every item on the dress code list. The fabric matched in both color and texture, the shirt was tailored, the supervisors were stumped. They talked to her about it not being in the spirit of the code, but the previous day's had been so a little weak logic there. She was always one of the best dressed people in the office, but she had the clothes to quit in.

    I don't remember her name, but for nearly 50 years she has been one of my personal heroes. So if you worked at Van Nuys toll. Thanks for helping that silly rule go away.

    Lin
    linkd is offline  
    Old 06-11-2015, 11:06 AM
      #26  
    Power Poster
    Thread Starter
     
    Join Date: May 2008
    Location: MN
    Posts: 24,643
    Default

    Originally Posted by linkd
    In the late 60's I worked for the telephone company as an operator. It was when pant suits were just starting to be available and the dress code was reluctantly modified to make them wearable to work. But the rules about what constituted a "pants suit" were very well defined. It needed to be the same fabric top and bottom, same color etc. One day a co-worker wore a very nice pair of burgundy wool pants and a matching wool sweater. She was sent home to change after much debate about woven wool vs. knit wool etc. The powers that be and the union rep reached an agreement that even though the rules did not describe it that way a "pants suit" basically meant a mens' wear style suit worn by a girl.

    My co-worker went home and came back the next day wearing .... jeans, a white button down shirt, and a jeans jacket. It checked off every item on the dress code list. The fabric matched in both color and texture, the shirt was tailored, the supervisors were stumped. They talked to her about it not being in the spirit of the code, but the previous day's had been so a little weak logic there. She was always one of the best dressed people in the office, but she had the clothes to quit in.

    I don't remember her name, but for nearly 50 years she has been one of my personal heroes. So if you worked at Van Nuys toll. Thanks for helping that silly rule go away.

    Lin
    Love it!!!!
    bearisgray is online now  
    Old 06-11-2015, 12:17 PM
      #27  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Mar 2012
    Location: Texas, USA
    Posts: 5,896
    Default

    Originally Posted by linkd
    In the late 60's I worked for the telephone company as an operator. It was when pant suits were just starting to be available and the dress code was reluctantly modified to make them wearable to work. But the rules about what constituted a "pants suit" were very well defined. It needed to be the same fabric top and bottom, same color etc. One day a co-worker wore a very nice pair of burgundy wool pants and a matching wool sweater. She was sent home to change after much debate about woven wool vs. knit wool etc. The powers that be and the union rep reached an agreement that even though the rules did not describe it that way a "pants suit" basically meant a mens' wear style suit worn by a girl.

    My co-worker went home and came back the next day wearing .... jeans, a white button down shirt, and a jeans jacket. It checked off every item on the dress code list. The fabric matched in both color and texture, the shirt was tailored, the supervisors were stumped. They talked to her about it not being in the spirit of the code, but the previous day's had been so a little weak logic there. She was always one of the best dressed people in the office, but she had the clothes to quit in.

    I don't remember her name, but for nearly 50 years she has been one of my personal heroes. So if you worked at Van Nuys toll. Thanks for helping that silly rule go away.

    Lin
    We had a similar dress code, when I worked in a department store, (sales lady) while attending school. Needless to say, I was working because I didn't have much money . . . yet we were supposed to be professionally dressed. Pants suits were allowed if the fabrics were matching and only if the top was a jacket. We were also supposed to wear heels(!), even if we were standing behind a counter. Fortunately, counters were very forgiving and some of us were barefoot, at times.
    Neesie is offline  
    Old 06-11-2015, 12:54 PM
      #28  
    Member
     
    margiepc's Avatar
     
    Join Date: Apr 2012
    Location: MA
    Posts: 91
    Default

    Originally Posted by Misty's Mom
    Remember when the girls would buy their Levi's, get them really wet and wear them til they dried so that when they shrunk, they were form fitting?
    I remember my sister doing that. One time she filled the bathtub , put on the jeans and sat in the tub and soaked for about an hour. She got out and let the jeans dry on her. When she took them off her skin was all blue from the dye. After she stopped crying we had a good laugh.
    margiepc is offline  
    Old 06-11-2015, 03:40 PM
      #29  
    Super Member
     
    Join Date: Jan 2007
    Location: western arkansas
    Posts: 2,077
    Default

    I agree. For the money- if I want faded and holes, I will do it myself. LOL
    mojo11 is offline  
    Old 06-12-2015, 05:55 AM
      #30  
    Senior Member
     
    Join Date: Feb 2012
    Location: Iowa and Minnesota
    Posts: 439
    Default

    With the new jean style I have to be careful when my kids ask me to mend their jeans that I fix the 'right' holes!!!!
    tildiemae is offline  
    Related Topics
    Thread
    Thread Starter
    Forum
    Replies
    Last Post
    AFQSinc
    Main
    17
    05-09-2011 03:56 PM
    leonajo
    Main
    6
    01-16-2011 09:41 AM
    running1
    Main
    5
    11-18-2010 02:06 AM
    grocifer
    Main
    8
    10-24-2010 04:21 AM

    Posting Rules
    You may not post new threads
    You may not post replies
    You may not post attachments
    You may not edit your posts

    BB code is On
    Smilies are On
    [IMG] code is On
    HTML code is On
    Trackbacks are Off
    Pingbacks are Off
    Refbacks are Off



    FREE Quilting Newsletter