Go Back  Quiltingboard Forums > Pictures
Will the Real 15 clone please stand up >

Will the Real 15 clone please stand up

Will the Real 15 clone please stand up

Thread Tools
 
Old 08-04-2012, 05:53 AM
  #201  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 420
Default

Originally Posted by redbugsullivan View Post
I just started piecing with my Morse 300 B-L and words cannot express my amazement. At first, I thought, "There is something wrong! The needle isn't threaded. The bobbin thread has broken. This is too smooth!" Then I realized, the machine was doing exactly what it was designed to to- Sew smoothly and cleanly with a minimal amount of extra effort or movement.

Sewing with my Morse is like stitching through butter...
Exactly! My 50's Olympia does the same thing. They are just so quiet and make such a pretty stitch. And fast!
grannysewer is offline  
Old 08-04-2012, 07:31 AM
  #202  
Power Poster
 
sewbizgirl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Mississippi
Posts: 25,991
Default

This is my blue Wizard machine... 15 clone, obviously. I believe these were made in Japan for Montgomery Ward stores to sell, around 1950, although the motor on it is a Champion, made in USA. This is a machine I'd like to sell. Just haven't had time to clean it up really well, tho it seems to sew just fine as is. The motor belt has just recently broken.
Attached Thumbnails green-wizard.jpg   wizard-machine-005.jpg  
sewbizgirl is offline  
Old 09-08-2012, 03:24 PM
  #203  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 3,992
Default Mercury Electric Dial-O-Matic

Miriam asked me to post pics of my Mercury Electric clone. I believe it was made by Morse as the motor is tagged Morse. The face plate and tension assembly resembles a Singer 15 but the rest of the machine looks like a Brother or White. The feed dogs can be raised or lowered and it has a vertical bobbin assembly. With a 1.2 amp motor this is one work horse of a sewing machine. Besides, she is pretty and shiny too.
Attached Thumbnails 2012-09-04-mercury-electric-sm-002.jpg   2012-09-04-mercury-electric-sm-010.jpg   2012-09-04-mercury-electric-sm-009.jpg   2012-09-04-mercury-electric-sm-006.jpg  
Caroline S is offline  
Old 09-08-2012, 04:59 PM
  #204  
Power Poster
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 15,507
Default

Caroline, I like that face plate! Very pretty machine. Don't those sew nice?
miriam is offline  
Old 09-09-2012, 07:56 AM
  #205  
Senior Member
 
redbugsullivan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Western Washington State
Posts: 548
Default

Love that Mercury! That's one interesting little critter. Quite a variety of design components and that great shine make it a sweetheart.
redbugsullivan is offline  
Old 09-09-2012, 09:43 AM
  #206  
Senior Member
 
JabezRose's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 385
Default

I love them all, like a kid in a candy store, face pressed against my monitor checking out the detail.
JabezRose is offline  
Old 09-09-2012, 11:01 AM
  #207  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Martinsville, Indiana
Posts: 1,430
Default

That Mercury is a pretty machine. I like her faceplate and the decals. They are really pretty. Is it a 3/4 size machine?
Janis is offline  
Old 09-09-2012, 11:39 AM
  #208  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 3,992
Default

Originally Posted by Janis View Post
That Mercury is a pretty machine. I like her faceplate and the decals. They are really pretty. Is it a 3/4 size machine?
No, she is a full sized gal and very heavy.
Caroline S is offline  
Old 09-09-2012, 12:10 PM
  #209  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Martinsville, Indiana
Posts: 1,430
Default

OK, now I see it. I think I was looking at the first picture and thought the harp space was smaller. With the foot control there, it does look smaller, and then I look at the second one and I can see just how big the harp space is. Is the harp space in the Singer 15 larger than the 66, or is there a difference? Which Singer has the largest harp space, do you know? I'm wondering just in case I want to machine quilt and want the largest space to do it in.
Janis is offline  
Old 09-09-2012, 12:23 PM
  #210  
Super Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 3,992
Default

Originally Posted by Janis View Post
OK, now I see it. I think I was looking at the first picture and thought the harp space was smaller. With the foot control there, it does look smaller, and then I look at the second one and I can see just how big the harp space is. Is the harp space in the Singer 15 larger than the 66, or is there a difference? Which Singer has the largest harp space, do you know? I'm wondering just in case I want to machine quilt and want the largest space to do it in.
Hmmm, I may have to run to get my measuring tape to determine if the harp space is the same as the Singer 15 or 66. I am thinking that they are about the same. The Mercury does have a reduced harp space because of the cast in light housing which reduces the height about one inch. A good piecing machine but not so sure at this point about quilting anything very large.
Caroline S is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OurWorkbench
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
106
03-14-2016 04:40 PM
olebat
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
14
04-06-2013 03:54 PM
summerstorm
Main
11
04-22-2010 04:03 AM
sondray
Recipes
0
09-20-2008 06:54 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are Off
Pingbacks are Off
Refbacks are Off



FREE Quilting Newsletter