Will the Real 15 clone please stand up
#201
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 420
I just started piecing with my Morse 300 B-L and words cannot express my amazement. At first, I thought, "There is something wrong! The needle isn't threaded. The bobbin thread has broken. This is too smooth!" Then I realized, the machine was doing exactly what it was designed to to- Sew smoothly and cleanly with a minimal amount of extra effort or movement.
Sewing with my Morse is like stitching through butter...
Sewing with my Morse is like stitching through butter...
#202
This is my blue Wizard machine... 15 clone, obviously. I believe these were made in Japan for Montgomery Ward stores to sell, around 1950, although the motor on it is a Champion, made in USA. This is a machine I'd like to sell. Just haven't had time to clean it up really well, tho it seems to sew just fine as is. The motor belt has just recently broken.
#203
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 3,992
Mercury Electric Dial-O-Matic
Miriam asked me to post pics of my Mercury Electric clone. I believe it was made by Morse as the motor is tagged Morse. The face plate and tension assembly resembles a Singer 15 but the rest of the machine looks like a Brother or White. The feed dogs can be raised or lowered and it has a vertical bobbin assembly. With a 1.2 amp motor this is one work horse of a sewing machine. Besides, she is pretty and shiny too.
#209
Super Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Martinsville, Indiana
Posts: 1,430
OK, now I see it. I think I was looking at the first picture and thought the harp space was smaller. With the foot control there, it does look smaller, and then I look at the second one and I can see just how big the harp space is. Is the harp space in the Singer 15 larger than the 66, or is there a difference? Which Singer has the largest harp space, do you know? I'm wondering just in case I want to machine quilt and want the largest space to do it in.
#210
Super Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sierra Vista, AZ
Posts: 3,992
OK, now I see it. I think I was looking at the first picture and thought the harp space was smaller. With the foot control there, it does look smaller, and then I look at the second one and I can see just how big the harp space is. Is the harp space in the Singer 15 larger than the 66, or is there a difference? Which Singer has the largest harp space, do you know? I'm wondering just in case I want to machine quilt and want the largest space to do it in.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
OurWorkbench
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
106
03-14-2016 04:40 PM
olebat
For Vintage & Antique Machine Enthusiasts
14
04-06-2013 03:54 PM