New and a question
07-29-2013, 08:45 AM
#12
Power Poster
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 41,481
Welcome from Ontario, Canada. I don't have an experience with the Quiltcut. That quilt certainly has enough little pieces that a cutting machine would do faster. I would weigh the cost of the machine against how many quilts I planned to do with tiny pieces.
07-29-2013, 02:38 PM
#15
Super Member
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 4,688
Welcome. I don't know the difference between the two for sure, but I think the original quilt cut did not have the speed gague like the quilt cut 2 does. Instead of DVD's, the older version of the 2 and the original came with VHS instructions.
I remember it took up a good bit of room -- they both take the 18x24(or 26??) cutting mat and work best if you have room to keep them out all the time. My friend bought one and Craig's listed it because it ate too much space. It is a great way to cut accurate pieces, though.
I remember it took up a good bit of room -- they both take the 18x24(or 26??) cutting mat and work best if you have room to keep them out all the time. My friend bought one and Craig's listed it because it ate too much space. It is a great way to cut accurate pieces, though.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
zoobird
Introduce Yourself
20
09-13-2013 12:36 PM
Elisabrat
Main
9
07-10-2012 07:26 AM
mjp123
Main
7
12-04-2011 07:07 AM
litacats
General Chit-Chat (non-quilting talk)
12
11-14-2011 11:45 AM
kate2
Introduce Yourself
26
02-16-2010 08:56 AM
